Facial analisys typing

[TheManBeyond]

Do you think it will work in a forum like this?, if you are willing to contribuite i'll start.
Let me now.

 

[TheManBeyond]

if you want to develop your fe this is the first step you must take

 

[nanook]

yeah, if you dare to type one person you will be responsible for them for the rest of your life

 

[TheManBeyond]

c'mon introverts....

 

[Cherry Cola]

the problem is facial analysis sucks and the people who do it are quacks even if they don't realize it themselves

 

[StevenM]

Facial analysis is extremely hard or impossible. At least, especially for just a static picture.

However, I think a lot can be told of a moving picture, plus them talking.

Still, the best way is to really get to know the person on a personal level.

 

[dark+matters]

the problem is facial analysis sucks and the people who do it are quacks even if they don't realize it themselves

Agreed. I mean... would you really know that Meryl Streep is an INTP from this picture?

 

[dark+matters]

...or that Sigourney Weaver is an INTP from this one?

 

[dark+matters]

...or that Dustin Hoffman is an INTP from this picture?

 

[dark+matters]

Not even Einstein looks like the stereotype of his type in this picture.

 

[dark+matters]

Even with video footage, I don't think you can really tell. I wouldn't automatically assume this guy is an INFP. (Okay, I just laughed out loud in a library. Not cool.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUltheRpJNw

 

[nanook]

V.I (visual identification) has to start with V.I. Go and find groups of objective physical traits. Then figure out if it's plausible to assume that these groups are identical to the types that have been described in the realm of interiority. Perhaps you can find 16 objective groups or a number of groups that can be divided by 16.

If you start with you subjective opinions about who is what type based on subjective ideas and what they may have said in interviews and shit (what a quackery, cola), you will always come to the conclusion that individuals of a type have little in common, because they are not actually of the same objective type.