Kirsanov
Redshirt
- Local time
- Today 6:23 AM
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2012
- Messages
- 24
Well for those wanting to type me first I should say a little bit about myself.
Currently I am a freshman in college studying Russian and will soon add History next year. I have been relatively interested in personality, but frustration last summer led me to disregard it. Although my Psychology 100 class gave me some new found motivation to try to figure out my type. In general I have trouble starting assignments, normally papers, but once I do I become a super machine churning it all out. If you need some writing samples feel free to ask, I have an excerpt from a paper I will include right now to give you some more elements to work on. Furthermore, I think I have it narrowed down to ENTJ, INTJ, or INTP.
I have been told that I am deliberate, decisive, level-headed, persistent, wise, have the power to push through b.s., thoughtful, and sweet (only if you know me very well).
This is the writing sample for a Western Civilization paper focusing on religions influence on politics:
Religion in the Roman Empire focused on the veneration of pagan gods as a civic duty, much like the practices of ancient Greece. Beginning with the reign of Caesar Augustus, emperors transcended plebeians and patricians as divine rulers. To promote unity Augustus encouraged an imperial cult which worshipped him as a god. This worship eventually released Roman emperors from the law and its boundaries. In his explication on The Power of the Roman Emperor, Cassius Dio stated, “For they have been released from the laws, as the very words in Latin declare; that is, they are free from all compulsion of the laws and are bound by none of the written ordinances” (13). Unlike the previous appellations attributed to Augustus which gave him tribunician power, chief priestly power, and militarily command; complete freedom from Roman law marked a grave change from precedents during the Roman Republic. No man may be considered above the law and jury while the republic lasted, yet Caesar Augustus not only consolidated immense power but attained divine immunity from traditional Roman social norms. Therefore the acclamation of Roman emperors from Augustus’s time onward as imperial gods exhibited the influence of polytheistic and pagan religion on a society which for the most part viewed religion as a civic duty without a sense of individuality.
For some negatives:
I can be pretty ruthless in debates sometimes causing me to regret how far I take them later on. This happened when I debated as Karl Marx and attacked my friend who played Gandhi, and when I noticed I wasn't necessarily winning I chose a somewhat effective but illogical approach of ad hominem attacks. Since I am very much like my father, he grew up in poverty and is extremely frugal, I too can very stingy. Once when I had to wait a few minutes too long in line for an Auntie Ann's pretzel I just left because I do not think they deserve my money, my sister pointed out how impatient and stingy that was. Again I am not good at reading people's emotions, but if I am having trouble I will relate my problems if my sisters ask me in a solitary situation. Generally I linger on something showing I am thinking deeply about my feelings which leads them to prod me for information. When it comes to saying an idiom, I always screw them up. I know what they are in my head, but I throw in or substitute a word leading to one massive line of confusion which most people laugh at. Furthermore I am very stubborn in my beliefs just like both of my parents. I don't suck up to people and even though a person has never told me they dislike me, I am sure there was probably a person who did dislike me in high school. In debates I can be very expressive to sway the side of the argument based on how it goes, and sometimes I get a little too passionate.
Currently I am a freshman in college studying Russian and will soon add History next year. I have been relatively interested in personality, but frustration last summer led me to disregard it. Although my Psychology 100 class gave me some new found motivation to try to figure out my type. In general I have trouble starting assignments, normally papers, but once I do I become a super machine churning it all out. If you need some writing samples feel free to ask, I have an excerpt from a paper I will include right now to give you some more elements to work on. Furthermore, I think I have it narrowed down to ENTJ, INTJ, or INTP.
I have been told that I am deliberate, decisive, level-headed, persistent, wise, have the power to push through b.s., thoughtful, and sweet (only if you know me very well).
This is the writing sample for a Western Civilization paper focusing on religions influence on politics:
Religion in the Roman Empire focused on the veneration of pagan gods as a civic duty, much like the practices of ancient Greece. Beginning with the reign of Caesar Augustus, emperors transcended plebeians and patricians as divine rulers. To promote unity Augustus encouraged an imperial cult which worshipped him as a god. This worship eventually released Roman emperors from the law and its boundaries. In his explication on The Power of the Roman Emperor, Cassius Dio stated, “For they have been released from the laws, as the very words in Latin declare; that is, they are free from all compulsion of the laws and are bound by none of the written ordinances” (13). Unlike the previous appellations attributed to Augustus which gave him tribunician power, chief priestly power, and militarily command; complete freedom from Roman law marked a grave change from precedents during the Roman Republic. No man may be considered above the law and jury while the republic lasted, yet Caesar Augustus not only consolidated immense power but attained divine immunity from traditional Roman social norms. Therefore the acclamation of Roman emperors from Augustus’s time onward as imperial gods exhibited the influence of polytheistic and pagan religion on a society which for the most part viewed religion as a civic duty without a sense of individuality.
For some negatives:
I can be pretty ruthless in debates sometimes causing me to regret how far I take them later on. This happened when I debated as Karl Marx and attacked my friend who played Gandhi, and when I noticed I wasn't necessarily winning I chose a somewhat effective but illogical approach of ad hominem attacks. Since I am very much like my father, he grew up in poverty and is extremely frugal, I too can very stingy. Once when I had to wait a few minutes too long in line for an Auntie Ann's pretzel I just left because I do not think they deserve my money, my sister pointed out how impatient and stingy that was. Again I am not good at reading people's emotions, but if I am having trouble I will relate my problems if my sisters ask me in a solitary situation. Generally I linger on something showing I am thinking deeply about my feelings which leads them to prod me for information. When it comes to saying an idiom, I always screw them up. I know what they are in my head, but I throw in or substitute a word leading to one massive line of confusion which most people laugh at. Furthermore I am very stubborn in my beliefs just like both of my parents. I don't suck up to people and even though a person has never told me they dislike me, I am sure there was probably a person who did dislike me in high school. In debates I can be very expressive to sway the side of the argument based on how it goes, and sometimes I get a little too passionate.