Black Rose
An unbreakable bond
To preference that which I have been compiling in terms has little to do with observation and more conjecture of disperse concepts accumulation provide where new models are made. Just recently I have come to manny accommodations for new application.
Extrapolating from Biology of Type with inhibition and reinforcement I now know where the dichotomies come from Feeling and Thinking along with Intuition and Sensation. First Sensation and Thinking are static, that is without motion. Feeling and Intuition are Dynamic, that is with motion. When one is in motion one cannot have complete compilation of structure and as all objects have shape all subjects have motion in the Extroversion type and Introversion type. So where as Extroversion has the world as a shape or in motion the introvert has themselves as static or dynamic in preoccupation of their stance regarding the external condition. Judging make decisions based on two criteria where and when as to getting from point a and point b. Perception simply observes the direction of where and when of point a and b not telling it where to go.
The Extroverted Thinker direct shapes in terms of other relationships, object to object.
The Introverted Thinker direct shapes in reference to them personally, objects relationship to subject.
The Extroverted Feeler wants objects to move in relation to objects.
The Introverted Feeler wants to move themselves in relation to the object.
The Extroverted Sensor has awareness of objects in relation to other objects.
The Introverted Sensor has awareness of objects in relation to themselves.
The Extroverted Intuitive anticipates how objects can follow or move in relation to other objects.
The Introverted Intuitive anticipates how objects can follow or move in relation to them personally.
For the INTP standard structure:
Ti direct shapes in reference to them personally, objects relationship to subject.
Ne anticipates how objects can follow or move in relation to other objects.
Si has awareness of objects in relation to themselves.
Fe wants objects to move in relation to objects.
Based on my previous model of how functions flow together it should be:
Si->Ti->Fe->Ne
Si has awareness of objects in relation to themselves.
Ti direct shapes in reference to them personally, objects relationship to subject.
Fe wants objects to move in relation to objects.
Ne anticipates how objects can follow or move in relation to other objects.
Extrapolating from Biology of Type with inhibition and reinforcement I now know where the dichotomies come from Feeling and Thinking along with Intuition and Sensation. First Sensation and Thinking are static, that is without motion. Feeling and Intuition are Dynamic, that is with motion. When one is in motion one cannot have complete compilation of structure and as all objects have shape all subjects have motion in the Extroversion type and Introversion type. So where as Extroversion has the world as a shape or in motion the introvert has themselves as static or dynamic in preoccupation of their stance regarding the external condition. Judging make decisions based on two criteria where and when as to getting from point a and point b. Perception simply observes the direction of where and when of point a and b not telling it where to go.
The Extroverted Thinker direct shapes in terms of other relationships, object to object.
The Introverted Thinker direct shapes in reference to them personally, objects relationship to subject.
The Extroverted Feeler wants objects to move in relation to objects.
The Introverted Feeler wants to move themselves in relation to the object.
The Extroverted Sensor has awareness of objects in relation to other objects.
The Introverted Sensor has awareness of objects in relation to themselves.
The Extroverted Intuitive anticipates how objects can follow or move in relation to other objects.
The Introverted Intuitive anticipates how objects can follow or move in relation to them personally.
For the INTP standard structure:
Ti direct shapes in reference to them personally, objects relationship to subject.
Ne anticipates how objects can follow or move in relation to other objects.
Si has awareness of objects in relation to themselves.
Fe wants objects to move in relation to objects.
Based on my previous model of how functions flow together it should be:
Si->Ti->Fe->Ne
Si has awareness of objects in relation to themselves.
Ti direct shapes in reference to them personally, objects relationship to subject.
Fe wants objects to move in relation to objects.
Ne anticipates how objects can follow or move in relation to other objects.