Te function = harshness, since it reserves only the stepwise plan of Te and everything else is blocked
Te function is like an ice breaker ship just continuing the plan as set in advance, no matter what ice is on the path, it cuts right through or will keep on pushing straight ahead even when...
You guys use "extraverting" while you should have said "judging"
To set things straight...
Extraversion is NOT the same as speaking/talking
Introversion is NOT the same as listening
Judgement = output = talking/speaking/acting/doing (or stepwise internal output within your brain...
that would suck, such boots would drive me crazy
p.s. The one that solves this challenge will get a one night free in my future space hotel, plus free late check-out so you don't have to hurry in the morning. If its a really good answer I'll even arrange you a girl (or boy, whatever you fancy).
It doesnt really help your typing credibility if you think you have strong Te while you are supposed to be an Ti dom. Thats like saying that you have a strong white color while you are a black person.
Better if you dont type haha
according to classical MBTI matching theory the best match is all 4 letters opposite except the S/N letter.
and the second best is not alternating T/F but same.
So for INTP its ENFJ 1st and ENTJ 2nd choice (good luck with those ENTJs haha)
INFJ would best match with ENTP 1st and ENFP 2nd...
Stock markets are there to fund companies. Did you know that means take money/control from individuals and insert it into big monstrous entities.
Who cares what your computer screen tells you about your "credits". Or how you transfer your credits from A to B, with some computer profit.
prediction is only an advantage if you say it out loud and people actually listen to your prediction, because then you have control
silent predictions are of no use, thats why they say "you cant predict the future"
yes true, we must see the problem as the relative difference between the 2 viewpoints. I was just reversing the viewpoint around to the other side, to say: they should both be possible at the same time (e.g. dont forget the other viewpoint).
is it just me or... if one is accelerated upwards...
My "reference frame of the ship" is NOT spinning. (at least in the way I painted the picture)
My "reference frame of the universe" is spinning. yes.
And by the way: That is quite similar on Earth itself. Except that our Earth model is 3D and our ship model is 2D. This gives me the chills...
Aha "curving along with it"? That is only if you are not relativistic, that only holds if you say the rest of the universe is (kind of) still, and only the ship is spinning. I turn things around, and then the default explanation doesn't hold, this is the root of the problem. And although I wish...
I didn't say anywhere that centrifugal force creates actual gravity, I said it creates artificial gravity, e.g. the effect of gravity.
And yes, I agree that centrifugal force is different from gravity according to "modern science", but thats only an assumption in our primitive...
I have thought about it from a lot of aspects, but I still don't get it.
Unless the universe around the station "counts more" because it is heavier (e.g. more mass counts more)???
otherwise one should be able to reverse the viewpoint as in my example "the ship is still, but the universe is...
THIS IS QUITE A CHALLENGE...
A space station in spin will make artificial gravity, this is the way we can live in space according to sci-fi. (e.g. So you can walk on the inside of the circle of the circular spinning ship and have artificial gravity)
But now think relativity:
You can also think...
consciousness/intelligence cannot be well-rounded since it is a form of specialiazation/differentiation, a deviation from the middle balance. thats why we are all typable
only unconscious/unintelligent/instinct is well-rounded (as in using all functions equally, being all types), because it...
ISFPs/ESFPs were not supposed to read it!
"super-retarded" should be read as "super-annoying". dont tell me that you never met a super-annoying ISFP/ESFP.
and i didnt insult all ISFPs/ESFPs, because i said in one of the first few lines "good ones exist too"
Lets talk about superretarded ISFPs/ESFPs (even though good ones exist).
I mean those ISFPs/ESFPs gone bad, the evil hateful ones. The ones with an evil cluster B personality disorder (histrionic, borderline, narcissistic, etc).
Think strippers, whores, and other low class trailer park scum...
So you guys are ENFP experts! I would really value your opinion on the following.
I am now actually hanging with a new girl who I think is ENFP, but she is actually the first real life person I have typed as ENFP, so I need to know if these are correct traits of an ENFP (below describes her...
Ne = pursue the pleasure of possible gain
Ni = avoid the pain of possible loss (e.g. foresee&protect)
Se = pursue the pleasure of immediate/concrete gain (e.g. enjoy the moment)
Si = avoid the pain of immediate/concrete loss (e.g. conserve the moment)
introverted functions avoid: they...
no, because they cancel out to nothing in the exact middle. in the middle exists only the great unconsious void, intelligence only exists as a deviation/specialization of the void. to have one function is to sacrifice another.
p.s. long time no see artsu! nice to see you! (i have been gone a...
Actually function 3&4 are originally called the shadow functions by Jung.
Jung called 1-2 the most "conscious / developed" functions (most effect on the intelligence of a person). And 5-6 the "most unconscious / primitive" functions(least effect on thethe intelligence of a person. (7-8 being...
That is exactly what I addressed with "stupidity to the max".
Your 3rd and 4th function are polar opposites of your 1st and 2nd function. If they would be in exact balance they would all cancel out to nothing. +1 + -1 = 0
(nothing = you would not experience any of those functions at all)...
and the subject of this thread is just stupidity to the max!
you could only have 2 equally dominant functions in your first 2 functions.
you could have Ti<>Ne balance, being between an ENTP and INTP.
or in general: balance in Ti/Fi<>Ne/Se or Te/Fe<>Ni/Si
that would probably be very scarce...
I (an ENTP) can explain you pretty well how an ENTP (an Ne dom) can look confident or unconfident:
Actually I'm always challenging my own theories (typical ENTP), I might even ask another something in a way as if i do not even believe my own theory, even if its really good, so that might look...
its actually depressing that you guys are so many months/years on this forum discussing jungian knowledge and you still cannot do better than those vague descriptions of Ne and Ni that suck all the way!
sorry but it really is like that
i dont want to be the jerk here or anything, but i really think more and more that you typed them wrong (if they have adhd/add).
the intj/intp is a common mis-type. also why entj/estj? it should be pretty simple to test between Si/Ni if you are into mbti.
maybe i'm stuck in my own theories, but it really doesnt make sense to me that an INTJ/NiTe or ESTJ/ENTJ/TeNi/TeSi has ADHD. They are supposed to be Te-guys for god's sake!
Are you really sure either label is correct for them?
Yes ADD=Pness, especially IxNPness. J's with ADD don't exist!
if an xxxJ claims to have ADD, then either the xxxJ claim is not right or the ADD claim is not right.
Most people type themselves (and others) wrong.
J's are Ni/Si with Te/Fe in first 2 functions, these people are made for project...
haha wow....entp haters!!
(i'm entp so watch out!)
we are actually known to be the most introverted-like extraverts!
but we actually are active in social media haha, there is a facebook group entp. we are less critical than you guys (weaker Ti) and dont hide behind anonymous accounts as...
Actually most inventors dont care much about exclusivity. The typical inventor just wants his ideas out there. He cares more about spreading it than about earning money from it.
Its just the parasites that usurp the inventor (and his creations) which want exclusivity of what they usurped, to...
Well yeah its because i'm pretty much like that (ENTP with Ne through the roof), so I know whats going on.
I'm pretty civilized, but really tend to move my eyes around too much. I never see myself, but it must look ackward. I'll also fidget if i cant find new stuff to look around at. Fidgeting...
Well Ne is pretty wacky!
It's because Ne is unable to see loss. It doesnt see how it can lose credibility by being ackward for example. It only sees possible profit. Possibilities to gain, possiblities to gain, possibilities to gain.
This is also why the eyes move around, they dont see the loss...
Typing celebs is also tricky, since you'll type them as their PR team wants them to be. They might be totally different in real life than their made-up public image. But maybe that is not really important because if the PR team makes them "look like a certain type" then it would still be the...
I challenge you guys: What meme/thought/concept cannot be stored in an Entity-Attribute-Value (EAV) database?
Entity-Attribute-Value(EAV) storage model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entity%E2%80%93attribute%E2%80%93value_model