INTP Forum

2). I know more on A.I. than any other topic that it is kind of my field of study. I have been asking myself how the objections to it and the approach to it all join together. I look at intelligence and the brain and the accumulated miscellaneous data I have on the subject. I've been working on the problem of how to make A.I. from 12 years old.

3) The static bee brain thing I just did not know, still don't know how you expected me to infer a bee brain simulation existed or failed to act like a real bee. I read what you said as hypothetical. And the static scan every neuron thing is stupid and is not what I believe is necessary. The principle is that the brain has a structure we can copy like Boston dynamics makes walking robots.

4)And the simulated mouse does mouse things by mapping the mouse brain not copying every neuron and synapse of one mouse. They knew all the parts of a brain of a mouse and put it together and it worked because of the research into making the microcolumns work. there was no copying, there was modeling of micro and macro circuits. They did their job to make is as statistically accurate to the functions in a mouse brain