• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.

space time continuum

sushi

Active Member
Local time
Today, 00:40
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
354
#1
does space becomes time or does space becomes distance?

space+distance--> time
or
space+ time--> distance

which one is right

I observe that it can really be both. doesn't that kind of imply time= distance

I observe this based theory based on two to three examples:
(1) the earth/planets rotating around the sun

when you are in outer space observing earth's rotation, you can only see distance and earth displacement change during rotation, not time.

(2) the escalator
when you obeserve escalator moving from one point to next, you can see only distance changing when the esclator moves from one point to next.

(3)spinning an office chair
generally the same conclusion, when you spin an office chair, the distance or displacement changed, there is no time change.

time= change in distance. distance = change in time?
 

sushi

Active Member
Local time
Today, 00:40
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
354
#2
maybe change in time=change in distance?
 

sushi

Active Member
Local time
Today, 00:40
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
354
#4
How do you know time has passed in outer space, assuming there is no clock? Only when a object change its position in the sky?

time= when an object change its position, like in an orbit


speed = distance / time
speed * time = distance
time = distance / speed

the problem with this is that it is based on earth frame of reference and clocks, which is not reliable in space and other non earth frame of reference.
 
Last edited:

sushi

Active Member
Local time
Today, 00:40
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
354
#5
it is almost as though time and distance is conserved. one becomes the other. this is based on my observation so far.
my premise is a simple question:

does space becomes time
or does space becomes distance

even now I have no answer.
 

sushi

Active Member
Local time
Today, 00:40
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
354
#6
theoretically space can expand and go on forever due to infinite direction

space+ direction--> forever


(a) space+ time--> forever
or
(b) space+ distance--> forever


which one is more true?
 

Grayman

Team Ignorant
Local time
Yesterday, 16:40
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
4,146
Location
US of A
#7
Time isn't only limited to space or distance. A second is now defined as when a cesium-133 atom performs 9,192,631,770 complete oscillations. The oscillation is when it changes energy levels and emits a photon.
This is the most accurate way to measure time and it has nothing to do with space or distance.
 

sushi

Active Member
Local time
Today, 00:40
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
354
#8
Time isn't only limited to space or distance. A second is now defined as when a cesium-133 atom performs 9,192,631,770 complete oscillations. The oscillation is when it changes energy levels and emits a photon.
This is the most accurate way to measure time and it has nothing to do with space or distance.
so time is independent from space?

I was reading something about quantum gravity and how it reveal the structure of spacetime.
 

Grayman

Team Ignorant
Local time
Yesterday, 16:40
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
4,146
Location
US of A
#9
so time is independent from space?

I was reading something about quantum gravity and how it reveal the structure of spacetime.
In the equation or in physical reality? Time and space are distorted by gravity and acceleration. The math is simple. Interpretating this into physical models is more difficult.

What about space is being distorted. If space is nothing how can nothing expand or contract? If time is distorting we have to figure out what time is before we can say what about it is distorting or how gravity can distort it.
 

sushi

Active Member
Local time
Today, 00:40
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
354
#10
it seems time passage always resulted in motion, or change in distance.

can time pass without change in distance? you notice time has passed because the clock hand has changed in distance and position.


if time is constant, space and distance will not change. (therefore, my hypothesis that they are tied together)
In the equation or in physical reality? Time and space are distorted by gravity and acceleration. The math is simple. Interpretating this into physical models is more difficult.

What about space is being distorted. If space is nothing how can nothing expand or contract? If time is distorting we have to figure out what time is before we can say what about it is distorting or how gravity can distort it.
in physical reality, equation only reflects physical reality.
 

Grayman

Team Ignorant
Local time
Yesterday, 16:40
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
4,146
Location
US of A
#11
it seems time passage always resulted in motion, or change in distance.

can time pass without change in distance? you notice time has passed because the clock hand has changed in distance and position.


if time is constant, space and distance will not change. (therefore, my hypothesis that they are tied together)


in physical reality, equation only reflects physical reality.
Spacial distance and change in position are one form of time. What about a digital clock that counts photon emissions from a cesium atom? Where is distance in that?
 

sushi

Active Member
Local time
Today, 00:40
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
354
#12
Spacial distance and change in position are one form of time. What about a digital clock that counts photon emissions from a cesium atom? Where is distance in that?

thats subatomic physics, where position and momentum of particle is uncertain and depends on the observer. still in macroscale, timepassing always result some form of displacment/ change in distance, at least based on my current hypothesis.

I wish to take free float in outer space and orbit a planet to test my hypothesis, but that is currently in our limitations, although there is Virtual reality simulating experience in outer space expereince.
 
Top Bottom