Quantum particles and Aether.

[s0cratus]

Quantum particles and Aether.

Maybe you know that surrounding space ( a reference frame )
makes influence on the objects that exist there.
For example, the fish in the water has another form than
animals which live in the forest or savanna.
The same is about quantum particles and aether.
Quantum particles exist in an Aether.
The physical parameters of aether is near to T=0K.
This thermodynamic condition has influence on quantum particles.
=.
According to Charle’s law and the consequence of the
third law of thermodynamics as the thermodynamic temperature
of a system approaches absolute zero the volume of particles
approaches zero too. It means the particles must have flat forms.
They must have geometrical form of a circle: pi= c /d =3,14 . .
( All another geometrical forms : triangle, square, rectangle . . .etc
have angles and to create angles need forces,
without forces all geometrical forms must turn into circle.)
#
If physicists use string-particle (particle that has length but
hasn’t thickness -volume) to understand reality
(and have some basic problems to solve this task) then
why don’t use circle-particle for this aim ?
===.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
===.

 

[walfin]

Is this supposed to be a poem?

 

[s0cratus]

We want to protect ourselves from too literally
and therefore vulgar comprehension.
/ Maybe scientific joke, maybe their motto /

 

[SLushhYYY]

Does it help that the theorized strings are closed contours vibrating in their own specific rhythmic pattern?

 

[s0cratus]

Does it help that the theorized strings are
closed contours vibrating in their own specific rhythmic pattern?

Doesn't ''closed contour '' of string particle have form of the circle ?

=

 

[s0cratus]

Doesn't ''closed contour '' of string particle have form of the circle ?

=

And when vibration (frequency ) of closed contour (circle)
creates its 'own specific rhythmic pattern'
( specific electric - electromagnetic waves)
=

 

[SLushhYYY]

Closed contour means it is just connected at both ends. Think of it as a ruubber band.

And when vibration (frequency ) of closed contour (circle)
creates its 'own specific rhythmic pattern'
( specific electric - electromagnetic waves)
=

Are you saying strings are made of electromagnetic waves? Strings are supposed to be the unified field.

 

[Montresor]

Quantum particles and Aether.

If physicists use string-particle (particle that has length but
hasn’t thickness -volume) to understand reality
(and have some basic problems to solve this task) then
why don’t use circle-particle for this aim ?

What would the radius be as T --> 0K?

 

[s0cratus]

Closed contour means it is just connected at both ends. Think of it as a ruubber band.



Are you saying strings are made of electromagnetic waves? Strings are supposed to be the unified field.

1
Even your 'ruubber band.' must make vibration (frequency )
2
One can say em waves, other can say unified em field.
=.

 

[s0cratus]

What would the radius be as T --> 0K?

If you want understand the radius of photon near T --> 0
-- play with the radius of an electron.
=

 

[s0cratus]

We want to protect ourselves from too literally
and therefore vulgar comprehension.
/ Maybe scientific joke, maybe their motto /

Why I wrote this ?

I want to say that the creators of quantum physics
( Einstein, Bohr, Heisenberg, de Broglie, . . Feynman . . . and others )
wanted to understand the reality of quantum micro-world
visually and literally as in the classical physics, but , . . without success .
And today's physicists (creating many abstractions ) invented the slogan :

' We want to protect ourselves from too literally
and therefore vulgar comprehension.'

Maybe this is scientific joke, maybe it is their motto
but from scientific point of view our existence seems paradoxical.

Can the real and visual existence of everything around us
( or the beginning of existence of everything )
be paradoxical or it have logical explanation ?
#
And we cannot understand reality without reference frame – aether.
Without to understand what aether is all debates is tautology.
===.

 

[s0cratus]

Quantum particles and Aether.

Maybe you know that surrounding space ( a reference frame )
makes influence on the objects that exist there.
For example, the fish in the water has another form than
animals which live in the forest or savanna.
The same is about quantum particles and aether.
Quantum particles exist in an Aether.
The physical parameters of aether is near to T=0K.
This thermodynamic condition has influence on quantum particles.
=.
According to Charle’s law and the consequence of the
third law of thermodynamics as the thermodynamic temperature
of a system approaches absolute zero the volume of particles
approaches zero too. It means the particles must have flat forms.
They must have geometrical form of a circle: pi= c /d =3,14 . .
( All another geometrical forms : triangle, square, rectangle . . .etc
have angles and to create angles need forces,
without forces all geometrical forms must turn into circle.)
#
If physicists use string-particle (particle that has length but
hasn’t thickness -volume) to understand reality
(and have some basic problems to solve this task) then
why don’t use circle-particle for this aim ?
===.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
===.

Some details

Charles' Law was formulated in 1787
. . . . . .
because gas consist on particles i take this law to the particles.
this is my first heretical -idea.

and because Charles' Law belongs to the temperature
of absolute zero T=0K i take this law to the nothingness - vacuum T=0K
it is my second heretical-idea

and because Charles' Law belongs to the theory of ideal gas
i take this theory to the nothingness- vacuum
this is my third heretical - idea
==,,

 

[s0cratus]

From modern physics' point of view "the ideal gas" doesn't exist.
But somehow (using small changes) the ideal gas becomes real gas.
( and according to QT a small change makes big difference and maybe
quantum changes turn ideal particles into real molecules)

From modern physics' point of view vacuum with parameter T=0K
doesn't have meaning.
Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’
by Steven Weinberg. Page 138.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /

But from the other hand, vacuum is most important conception
in physics because somehow ( through small quantum changes –
vacuum fluctuation ), from this 'no meaning vacuum '
the real particles appear.
=
Physics is full with many abstractions.
But under these abstractions are hidden true ideas.
=..