Poll Number Two

[Perseus]

What would you rather be?

Or what would you feel most aggrieved if you were not?

autonomous
audacious
benevolent
benficient

 

[Perseus]

With more votes coming in, the results are interesting. No conclusions can be drawn, but it is better than a one person survey. I suspect the varied nature of modern society makes for a lot of switching.

Afterall, this is more sociology than scientific psychology (which the system does not stand up to Hawk, INTJ, srutiny).

 

[Wisp]

I humbly submit the idea that MBTI doesn't fit well with animals.

Something so comlpicated doesn't fit in something so simple.

Whatever.

 

[Perseus]

What would you rather be?

Or what would you feel most aggrieved if you were not?

autonomous = RATIONAL (NT)
audacious = ARTISANS (SP)
benevolent = GUARDIANS (SJ)
benficient = IDEALISTS (NF)
---

autonomous = RATIONAL (NT)
audacious = ARTISANS (SP)
benevolent = GUARDIANS (SJ)
benficient = IDEALISTS (NF)