• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Forum Mafia Game #2

Sinny91

Banned
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
May 16, 2015
Messages
6,299
---
Location
Birmingham, UK
I have thoughts on Blarraun, though I'm not providing them yet (again, sorry guys <3)

I want to see what you guys think. It looks like I'm pretty comfortable right now not getting lynched.

I'm gonna head to bed (or you know, do something other than mafia until I fall asleep). Tomorrow I plan on looking over some people I haven't payed enough attention to. I need to second-guess my green reads on Sinny and urakro. Zerkalo, PMJ, and reluctantly should expect some attention since they've been fairly active.

Gopher and RB are honourary confirmed town since they're so active.

I'm at the point where I want to start confirming town and ruling out lynches.

To those looking for something to do in the meantime, I want thoughts on Sinny. People keep saying she's "off" but other than a few small things, I don't see it. She's one of my top two town reads. I'm hesitant to white-knight her, but she is someone I payed attention to and she came out looking green to me when I consider what I'd expect a red sinny to know she could get away with. Yes she's stubborn, but that doesn't mean she's retarded and can't learn. She was undeniably wrong about me last game, I would be disappointed in anyone who didn't take a step-back. (Oh and btw whoever said it, I most certainly don't think I 'won' anything by her being wrong that game. I knew the entire time that I was town. It's not like the result was ever in question for me. Rather, I consider it a failure on my part for having drawn that much ire in the first place, it was a blatant mistake on my part. Not to mention me tunneling on ESC which she was right about).

I'm glad that you feel that way Hado, it's nice to be able to put aside our mutual bullshit in order to work together, as a team. I look forward to your review of my activity.

There's been so much information today, I'm sure everybody is in a state of absorption at the moment, I know I am.
 

Hadoblado

think again losers
Local time
Tomorrow 6:22 AM
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
7,065
---
@PMJ
I withhold some views. Tactically. Previous times I've withheld have turned out okay right?

While still withholding 10%, I've still contributed a hell (and I mean a metric fucking hell) of a lot more than you. Or most people here even. It's pretty obvious I'm not withholding because I'm afraid to post. So you keep focusing on the fact that I'm not giving 100% while still not reaching half of the 90% I have given freely.

Not to mention that as mafia I could easily avoid giving useful answers to these questions without arousing suspicion.

For example, just not mentioning Blarraun, instead of saying specifically that I have some thoughts on Blarraun that I'm not giving. See how much easier that would have been for a scum Hado?
 

The Gopher

President
Local time
Tomorrow 7:52 AM
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
4,674
---
My games.

I can't find the first game I played as town it seems to have removed all games before somewhere in 2012. But this is a town one. (JacobStrangelove)

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/381931-newbie-mini-mafia-xxxi

My filter

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/381931-newbie-mini-mafia-xxxi?user=JacobStrangelove

I can't find the Scum game I won but the one I replaced into I lost. Side note spagatiutios is Hado.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/391615-newbie-mini-mafia-xxxv

My filter

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/391615-newbie-mini-mafia-xxxv?user=JacobStrangelove

Hado's filter (also mafia that game)

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/391615-newbie-mini-mafia-xxxv?user=Spaghetticus

I can't believe the last game's I played were 2012 and 2013.
 

ika

Member
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Jun 12, 2016
Messages
34
---
Friends in high places will allow for such comforts.

That's cool. Have a nice sleep.

Keep withholding your views. Maybe you can stay under the radar a while longer, eh? Make it over the finish line.

:facepalm:

do you have a read list?
 

Sinny91

Banned
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
May 16, 2015
Messages
6,299
---
Location
Birmingham, UK
Redbaron filter:

There's only been 1 host on this site so that's basically a given. I mean, you're also the best host too, right?

Tempted to vote Hadoblado just to not have to look at Justin Bieber's shit head 20 times per page.

In response to Gopher
My stance is the same as it was last game: that it's impossible to discern between terrible town and actual mafia, so if someone looks like they're not pulling weight then you hammer them until you either see reason to put the hammer down, or you continue until all 206 of their mafioso bones are shattered.

Waiting for the next Artsu :^)

I was trigger happy on some people last game because I fell victim to Availability Heuristic. 72 hour Day cycle is pretty long, but if lurkers aren't producing anything in the next ~12 or so (that's almost a day from when game started, so timezone isn't valid excuse at that point) I'm going to start hammering. But just to get them jumpstarted:

Vote PmjPmj

Response to Hado:
I like to think that causing someone a psychotic breakdown in order to improve my chances of winning the game is well worth it.

:^)

Response to Urakro
That's basically what I'm doing and it's why I'm starting with lurkers. Everyone who's posted is more suspicious than a lurker, but that's just because they've actually posted. I probably never would have picked Artsu last game and losing to a lurking mafia is just offensive.

Like he just sat there having a fake psychosis and wins the game without even trying. I'll make cases against people, when people are all contributing. If there's people not contributing, I'm trying to lynch them. Otherwise what's the point? Last game the mafia just sat around and let the Town tear itself apart, so my objective for this game is to at least make the mafia play the fucking game if they want to win.

Also I'm on phone so cbf formatting quotes, but I don't know why you'd just drop suspicion on me. Like the reason is dumb because roles are randomed and I was actually making a joke that he's only the best by default, it was facetious, not complimentary - but until I said this, you wouldn't know that.

Same as last game, the problem Town faces is that people think in weird patterns and don't trust their suspicions, while simultaneously wanting to do some weird meta-game thing that could hypothetically work - but it's majority of Town's first ever mafia game. The result is a bunch of Town going in circles and never picking a direction, so the scum just do what scum do best - sit back and watch the world burn.

At this point I have more 'terrible town' reads than there are mafia in the game, along with 3 lurkers. I'm sure there's mafia in there somewhere (I don't think both Hado and Gopher are mafia, one maybe but I doubt both) but I want to at least let the lurkers pipe up this time before I start tunneling.

Also because I don't want another RB-tunnels-everyone-show-while-half-the- town-posts-once-a-day type of game.

EBWOP: the point being that you basically put pressure on me, then removed it just as quickly. If you're Town, why do this? Everyone that isn't yourself is a suspect.

Lol phone wigged out and crashed my post in progress died.

Short version is that the vote is Town's most important weapon and there's no point in stashing it for a rainy day. But as long as we don't have to have the "but I don't wanna lynch day one!!" argument I guess there's no problem.

PmjPmj you assrod, get in here.

As uninformative and pointless as all Pmj's posts were, I don't think he's the best mafia candidate.

Unvote PmjPmj

Response to Cheese:
Pretty sure he's just pulling a Happy from Game 1 and relishing the idea of being super edgy and making it look like he's mafia but not - or is he? Or is he cop? Or mafia? Or town-cop-mafia-doctor?? OOoooOOOOooo

I read Happy as town for this same shtick in the first game, and I was right. I've only ever played 1 game of mafia and all I can do is test and re-test my experiences until I can see a pattern of rightness forming.

Yes we want to discourage anti-town behaviour, but we don't want to lynch bad townies - we want to lynch actual mafia. It's shit to have bad townies, but it's worse to lynch them as well.

Is this going to be RB and Hado vs. the world again? I think it's going to be RB and Hado vs. the world again.

I don't think Hadoblado is mafia for the same reasons as last game. I've had a decent amount of interaction with him, and I don't really have any issues with his thought process or output so far. This happened last game, where I had more meta-information available and I didn't suspect him, even though I can understand why people without that meta-information would suspect him.

He might be royally fucking with me, but I don't think Hado's got that much hubris in him and at this point I have so many Terrible Town reads that I don't know where to start (but I'm going to start anyway).

Firstly, what I don't understand is this from Zerkalo:



How can you be okay with someone playing, "entirely from intuition"? It just allows people to have random thoughts and suspicions without having to coherently justify anything. Don't you see a problem with that?

Response to Gopher:
50% chance he'd bus with you? Why? Or is this just another intuition?

Response to Gopher:
Because of a history of interaction and discussion. I legitimately don't think Hado could play mafia and have me not see straight through the act. It's a bold claim, but I'll stand by it.

Gopher
I'm going back to my original point: I don't think you can both be mafia. If there's bussing going on, it's way too shitty and transparent to be the product of two experienced players.

Also Bronto, stop lurking. I'm not having Artsu v2.0 in this game.

Vote Bronto

Gopher
?

I said literally nothing about Cheeseums, yet you're suddenly both on the defensive over it - and now apparently just mimicking my own reasons for not suspecting Hado and applying the template to each other?

You could have had daily conversations, sure - but why do you wait until now to bring that up? You had lots of actual reasons but still hid behind the intuition shtick - which sets you up to not reveal actual reasons later in the game.

Bronto hurrry up and be useful so I can start hammering these two. Even Artsu posted more than you have so far at this point of Game 1.

Gopher
Here's what doesn't make sense:



That's pretty strong. Four years of daily interaction, but apparently your read on him is weak?

[/B]How can you have this strong intuition, along with a giant post that you say is all very townlike and your read on him is, "not so much green"?

Zerk
Bold: isn't that just so convenient though? I mean, you and Puffy just played the last game by wriggling in and around the suspicions of other people. It's what I had you pegged as mafia for on the start of Day 2 - and I was right, when pretty much everyone else thought you were glowingly town.

The fact that multiple people hold the same suspicions isn't something that makes someone any less scum.

Gopher
I'm happy enough to lynch a lurker instead of an active-but-slightly-suspicious Townie, because I'm aware that Availability Heuristic plays an even bigger part in this game than I initially realised.

At worst we would have lynched either Ruminator or Artsu. One was mafia and the other was way less helpful than Cheeseums would have been on Day 2 (imo).

Gopher
Fucking wot?

"Not so much green" = "utterly convinced of his townliness"

Am I really expected to be able to parse that kind of phrasing accurately?


I'm just going to go and post-by-post the exact order of everyone's votes so far so we can stop stop turning in circles playing, "he said she said" already.

Happy votes Gopher

Zerkalo votes Jenny

Cheeseums first to vote Hado

Jenny votes Happy

Gopher votes Happy, then FOS's Hadoblado

RB votes Pmj

Helvete votes Happy

Gopher now unvotes Happy


Cheesums now unvotes Hado

Pmj votes Sinny

RB unvotes Pmj

Gopher votes Bronto


Sinny votes Bronto


RB votes Bronto

On that note: Unvote Bronto

There's 2 whole days left and I don't want to have a lynch with that much time on the clock. I'm still pressuring him to contribute but I don't want him lynched before he's even had a chance.

Gopher put his vote on Happy right after Jenny's joke of, "he's too happy" but then he continued on to not actually pressure Happy at all, and instead went hard on his FOS on Hadoblado. So he votes Happy (severe) and only FOS's Hado, but then all his energy gets apparently directed at Hado, who Cheeseums actually voted.

Then he goes on to defend Cheeseums from Hado, trying to justify why Cheeseums' post is actually solid and he's his strongest town read.

His only original vote came on Bronto, after a bunch of people already aired suspicions about his lack of activity.

Hado, why do you read Pmj as green? I have my own reasons that I'll elaborate on in a bit, but I want to hear yours first.

Hado
I'm asking why you DO think he's town.

EBWOP: or if you think he's scum, elaborate on that anyway. I assumed you thought he was town because you said you weren't going to vote for him. Unless you were just baiting him and I just ruined it :^)

Hado
Oh that's my bad then.

I was going off this post.

It looked like you were trying to get him to contribute more, so that he wouldn't be an easy target for actual mafia to deflect attention to. I assumed you had a town read and didn't want him to get lynched because of that.

Anyway, the reason I think Pmj is town:

He's new as far as I know, and I think that the mental pressure that mafia feel in early games would prevent a new player from playing the whole, "I've got a horse head and a tommy-gun, hehe look at me I'm mafia! Or am I?!?! xD!!!!" shtick.

It's a ballsy gambit for actual mafia to do, and I don't think Pmj is the type to do it. I think he's just being an edgelord like Happy, I read Happy as town last game for the same reason. I guess that's pretty tenuous reasoning, but right now it's more reason to think him town than I have for some other people.

I have Terrible Town reads coming out of my ears right now, so I'm trying to discern which ones are actually town and then work from there.

Hado
I actually thought he was brand new, so my theory of why he's Town just went out the window.

Pmj now demoted from Terrible Town to possible mafia.

Yeah and Artsu had a psychotic breakdown :rolleyes:

Been playing Overwatch and checking the thread on my phone for the last few hours. Will case soon.

Okay firstly, there's too many lurkers still. Not by post-count, by actual contribution. Gopher still has my FOS but I can't really go down that path until the following four say stuff that means anything to the game:

Happy
Zerkalo
Bronto
Helvete


Happy: he's working apparently. His iPad doesn't work. His phone has low battery. His boss wants him to buy another latte for the 9am meeting. He's got more projects from work this weekend. I predict next he'll probably have a psychotic breakdown :^)

Zerkalo: can't read, because she isn't saying anything that means anything. She's not scummy nor town - she's just arranging assortments of words. Even in her mafia game she had more backbone than this, so I wonder: why is she playing so safe if she's Town. She would have even less to worry about no?

Bronto: Shadow Cart indeed.

Helvete: not contributing, doesn't seem to respond to anyone's questions but asks questions about other people's questions to make it look like he's participating to the atmosphere of questions (or something).

I'm still happy to lynch a lurker. Last game, if we'd lynched Ruminator, ESC or Artsu (perennial lurkers of Day 1) early game instead of Cheeseums I'm sure it would have turned out better for Town. It drained a significant amount of mental energy to constantly be wondering about the continued silence of players and their non-contribution, and since I could never get a read I kept defaulting back to Ruminator - who, fucking amazingly actually flipped Green. And ESC's Day 1 silence made me super suspicious as well, which made it easy to start tunneling the wrong target.

So at this point I'll lynch a lurker, if only to have my scumhunting filters free of the unneeded variables that come with having lurkers - and because it makes sense for one of the mafia to be a lurker. Even with extra pressure on lurkers, it's a sound strategy to play regardless. In perusing through various games on mafia sites, it's not a small number of them in which I've observed mafia frequently having, "extra-curricular work/study activities" at rather convenient times - Puffy and Zerkalo did it all last game as well.

Zerkalo: hey have a major exam now kthxbai :^)
Puffy: oh whoops have to go to work for the next 27 hours so can't help out until just before lynching deadline kthxbai :^)

As of me posting this there's about 40 hours until Day end. I'll present my case within the next 12 and that still leaves close to 30 hours for people to decide on lynching lurkers vs. active cases or whatever.

Bed time.

Zerk
What? Did you even read my post?

I said at least twice that I'm going to bed and that I'll be making the case when I get up - but that it'd be nice to have these people actually contribute in the meantime. But sure, it's "full of shit" for me to pressure lurkers to contribute and to actually go to sleep, but it's not, "full of shit" for you to just accuse someone then leave and come back with, "oh, it was just an experiment sry guyz xDDD!!"?

You know what, I'm not even mad that you think I'm full of shit. I'm mad that all you've done is distort what I've posted and your response to me calling you out for doing nothing is basically just, "no YOU'RE doing nothing!"

I even said:

Okay, on Gopher: I actually started making my case and have made about 9-10 posts questioning his actions already. So I'll start with this post: http://intpforum.com/showpost.php?p=532508&postcount=246

Gopher, your wording is dodgy as fuck. You state that you can't explain your reasons because you play by intuition. Then when you're pressured to give reasons by Hado because he just can't accept intuition, you give reasons.

You call Cheeseums your, "strongest town read" which turns out to actually just be, "well he's not as scum as my other reads". You've got this huge wealth of experience and know him intimately, your read is weak but you describe it using the word, "strong". Your posts just aren't consistent with one another, and I find them impossible to parse.

Also when I said that I don't believe a Hado-Gopher bus, you said, "actually it IS possible" and I again, denied that I'd buy into that, you came back saying that, "okay so then it's a Cheeseums-Gopher bus?" - you're just strawmanning me here. Me saying, "I don't buy a Hado-Gopher bus" has nothing to do with me thinking that there's a Gopher-Cheeseums bus.

Your motives are unclear, and you're doing a good job of pulling people INTO collective motivation with you. You're experienced enough to know that the win condition of this game is a team one - even if you die, you're setting up the mafia to win because if you flip red, Cheeseums would be next on the chopping block, and he's likely town - unless you're just trying to set up a WIFOM situation where people go, "ooh but Gopher wouldn't so obviously set up Cheeseums that's too obvious!" or some shit.

That said, the Cheeseums-Hado thing is pretty much the only time you've made a case, and otherwise all you've really done is target lurkers. You remind me a lot of Puffy last game. You're more active, a lot of your points are townish - yet your suspicions have all just been tacked onto the coattails of other people's.

You're justifying your ambiguous wording with, "oh but I'm just an ENTP ;)" - which is a joke, but it's playing to the meta. "It's just who I am yo!" isn't and really shouldn't be a viable defence tactic for mafia. It's like the self-voting bullshit from last game, it's just an emotional ploy that makes people instinctively back off because they don't want to violate things potentially personal to them.

EBWOP: The point being that you're pulling more people into unclear territory by doing this, which means the game gets harder as it goes on, not easier.

Gopher
Again you're distorting what I'm saying.

My votes so far have been on Pmj and Bronto, and I've expressed suspicion of moree people than just you. I wonder why you're assuming that you're my top target?

My point is that your posts are just completely unclear and I can't parse the things you say, because you're inconsistent - and you need to give me a better reason for you being inconsistent than just, "it's my personality".

Also last game 2 self-voters out of 4 turned out to be mafia. Artsu, Puffy, ESC and Cheeseums were the self-voters.

Also are you going to respond to the bulk of the post, because you've literally only commented on the inside joke and not...anything else?

Dude what the fuck? :ahh:

This is what I mean when I say you're impossible to parse. At least use a different colour or something so that it's immediately obvious that there's a response in the quote. Last response you did some weird as shit formatting of Cheeseums posts, then Hado's, now you're on a new format for mine.

Anyway, reading now, will respond soon.

Also, this make it fucking impossible to actually quote your post since I have to go and manually copy-paste, add quote tags and chop out all of my stuff to do so. Then the quote box also won't have a link back to your original post either, so if anyone ever wants to reference the shit that you've said - I can't just click the little blue arrow, I have to again manually go and fucking find it buried in the thread somewhere to do it.

Holy shit, this might be the best frustration tactic ever invented.

Gopher
Much appreciated :^)



On Page 3 you just came out saying Cheeseums was Town and just started giving reasons after Hado literally hammered you foor it and told you to stop playing coy. Also, this gem:



WIFOM'ing the shit out of my reads.

That's actually my bad, I didn't read what you quoted from me and I thought you were deflecting the bus to Cheeseums.



Convenient timing, but I have him as a null read for the same reasons so whatever.



I made this post.

And I thought you responded to that with this.

That's actually my bad, I didn't read what you quoted from me but because you posted directly after me, I thought you were deflecting the Hado-Gopher bus to Cheeseums-Gopher bus (because I wasn't buying it).



Since it doesn't look like you're deflecting a bunch of busses, he wouldn't necessarily.



So wait a second, the part in blue: You can use the argument against me that I'm only going for lurkers...even though I've been going for you when you even admit that you're the most active in the entire thread?

:ahh::ahh:

I don't really have that much issue with your responses, except for the fact that you're still saying inconsistent shit. But the bussing was a mistake on my part and I know I also tunneled on ESC for lots of inconsistencies, when it turned out he really was just inconsistent.

My problem is this: I actually can't read you either way because you've basically just made everything one big clusterfuck of inconsistent and impossible to understand garble. If you stop doing that, then fine. If you keep doing it, I can't ignore it because it keeps raising red flags - I have to ask you A LOT more questions than others to just to get you to say what you actually mean by things.

Also the fact that you are very experienced, good at playing scum and could easily play this game to a mafia victory makes me not want to give you a free pass. In your words, if you were scum would you actually allow yourself to come up red? Probably not - but I really don't know how scum would avoid it. If there's people who can see through your filters, then why not?

I've seen quite a few games where experienced and really good scum players get ousted as scum early on just because they happened across 1 person who happened to be attuned to their particular brand of bullshit. Feel free to make your case, mine's finished - and yes it was primarily to do with the bussing/the inconsistencies in your posting and the way that you seemingly distort what I'm posting.

But again, that's not necessarily a mafia thing and I'd rather not keep lynching people just for being the most inconsistent because it seems to turn out shit.

Cheese
1. Go to this post
2. Now start segmenting it and responding as if you're quoting and responding to Gopher.
3. ????
4. Aneurysm

He fixed it, so it's all good :^)

Gopher
That's a fair analysis. The thing I was skeptical of was whether or not you would have gone to that extent of analysis if Hado hadn't pressured you. As I re-read page 3, I was a bit annoyed that Hadoblado had hammered you so damn hard - because then maybe we'd see what level of reasoning you'd provide without prompting. He basically strongarmed you into providing a huge chunk of reasoning, so the more I re-read it, the less I get anything from it.



I guess I didn't read your case on Hado that aggressively, because you didn't really ever hammer him for anything despite agreeing with me that it's good to hammer suspects? I don't know your style, but when you say, "hey great idea!" and then proceed to not follow-through it does look scummy. But again, all I'm reading on you is infinite inconsistencies and wifom everywhere.



If you want you can make it anyway. If nothing else, more cases increases clarity for Town and we can move on to hunting better scum targets.

I'll just ask you more questions if you say stuff that's inconsistent, because if you're mafia then this is actually too easy for you because you're everything is wifom with you - so I have no idea if me reading 47 inconsistencies in your posts means anything anymore because the whole bus thing was a mistake by me.

Last game I was certain that a couple of inconsistent people were scum and they weren't, so hopefully if I don't continue tunneling you it turns out to be a case of me learning when to hit the brakes on a tunnel, as opposed to you outplaying me. At the very least if you're mafia and you win, you didn't win by staging a psychotic breakdown...my ego won't take that hit again :p

Tbh it really was the potential bus that tied it together. It looked like you could be trying to maneuver yourself into a spot where you could divide Hado from Cheeseums (easy done because Hado called the wagon on Cheeseums) and basically make the town forever struggle to get majority votes.

If I see you say stuff that other people don't already question, I'll question it.

Gopher
I described how I thought Town should play:



Your response:



You applauded the position, but never took it up yourself, just flipped the onus back onto me. Either it's not your gameplan or you don't really think it's a good position. It still does look suspect to me, especially now that you've just admitted your case against Hado was just calling him out for not doing what you expect him to do - you mean you didn't even have him as a scum read?

No real hammering involved, despite you thinking it's a good position? Is that because you don't think it's actually a good position? Why aren't you adopting the position you call good? Do you have a better position? If so, what?

These are the inconsistent things I'm talking about. You say one thing matters, then don't do it. Or you say that if you were mafia you wouldn't be able to be read as mafia, but it's a fact that even good mafia players can get read as mafia. Maybe you won't get lynched, but to have certain people simply read you as mafia is surely not a huge stretch of the imagination?

Have you legitimately just not been read as mafia early on in a game where you're scum before?

These are the sorts of questions I've been mulling over all game - your posts to me are the most confusing in the game, but they aren't necessarily the most scummy. Your interaction style is difficult for me to parse and I think this is a problem I'd have regardless of if you're town or mafia.

Zerk
Protecting one of your scum buddies?

But okay, fair enough since my case against Gopher is pretty much resolved at this point because I can't glean a solid case from his responses and I have nothing else to really go off.

Speaking of other cases, time for you to respond to this post.

Hado
Fair assessment, although I don't know what isn't as sharp, so if you're basing it on that - you're going to have to build a case. Last game my apparent 'sharpness' led me to tunneling on three people who turned out to be town. I have to accept that my filter of deciding who is and isn't town is inherently flawed and that I need to choose my tunnels correctly because I didn't accurately predict a single mafia on Day 1 last game.

I spent the entirety of last game on Ruminator's case for lurking and she turned up town. I'm trying to not tunnel one particular person because it just makes it easy for mafia to hitch along for the ride and continue skewing perceptions.

I never suspected Zerkalo or Puffy in Day 1, and there's people who right now I wouldn't suspect...which makes me suspect them.



Last game I was pretty confident in my own ability to read, but because I had zero experience at the game I had no way of confirming that I was in any way capable - so at every point where we seemed to have a difference of opinions, I was happy to defer to you.

After the game I realised that a few of my reads were actually correct, and with a few adjustments and if I don't tunnel quite as hard, there'd be no reason I couldn't make other good scum reads. I'm still having trouble discerning town, but I think I'm getting better.

Lack of experience or not, I have confirmation both that I can be good at this game but also that a lot of the methods I was using to read people last game were faulty.

But if you're suspicious, case at me bro.

Didn't refresh page so my last post was in response to this one:


That said I'm happy to go with this:

Can confirm Gopher hasn't learned to fight through the shooting nerve pains like true gamers do.

I don't actually like the Reluctantly wagon. Guy strikes me as well-intentioned town, saying things that aren't necessarily best strategy overall but I see where he's getting it from.

e.g. discussing power roles is generally just bad because it creates confusion for everybody involved, both town AND mafia. And before anyone says, "but isn't confusing mafia bad?" I just want to point out that it confuses everyone - town included. Except there's one big difference - mafia already have a massive information advantage, so they deal with confusion much better.

Secondly, he's created a massive WIFOM when and/or IF it comes to reveal time. Since he's talked about how mafia won't role reveal because the real power role would know and call them out - so we'd know who was fake or not - what's to stop mafia from using the same tactic? Wait for the real cop/doctor to call them out and then call them on it as if they're the real cop/doctor? We'll never know who to trust now because Reluctantly's already created wifom around the whole situation.

ALL THAT SAID: I don't think he's mafia. He's read some guides, he's thinking strategy and he's earnestly trying to help town. I'm pretty okay with standing by that conviction, because even though saying it was bad: he's entirely correct about how the situation would and should go down, and the strategy that the power roles should play (not revealing too early etc.)

So I don't have him as a high scum read, because he wouldn't go and share a really good strategy that benefits Town. Would he do it just to fuck with us all? Okay, maybe...but we wouldn't know he was fucking with us until he actually flipped red or got read by the cop - which means that we wouldn't question his good strategy until he was already dead...which would be pointless.

So it leaves me with two possibilities:

#1 is that Reluctantly shared a really good strategy with town to help town, because he's town
#2 is that Reluctantly shared a really good strategy with town to ultimately hinder town and to try and look more town. But he's not actually trying that hard to look town in my eyes, so if this was his ploy...it's not consistent with how scum Reluctantly would play that card overall.

EBWOP: his comments about how power roles should play are good strategy in terms of content, it's just the act of bringing it up that wasn't - is what I'm saying.

Reluctantly
No, I get it.

My point is, it doesn't need to be brought up this early and it detracts from proper discussion.

The thing is that you're not really wrong about any of it and it's strategically sound. You being not wrong makes me also think you're not mafia because you'd have no reason to share this stuff with us. You're eager to share this stuff and that's fine, but it's actually better saved for when it's useful.

You're not wrong and I think you're not mafia because of it. Just focus on hunting scum and/or finding town at this point.

Bed time for me. Will be back with at least four hours to spare before EOD.

Zerk
Pretty sure I've given my reads for at least 6 people not named Gopher or Hado, but okay.

Sinny I've just been actively avoiding her all game because if she's mafia I can't read her at this point and I cbf splitting town votes and wasting time arguing with her just because I think some of her reads are dumb on Day 1.

Pmj's not off my suspicion list. He's just not as high.

Also fwiw, Happy isn't playing the way he played last game - that's the point. Pmj is playing like Happy from Game 1, while Happy is playing not like Happy from Game 1. I'm not just talking about activity, it was the whole, "oh I have a horse-head and a tommy-gun, look @ me I'm mafia! hehe!" shtick that Happy played last game, which Pmj is playing this game. Happy isn't. He's just playing like he's time-poor.

Also, while I think that shtick is really fucking stupid, but it's not scummy.

Again the point being that Happy who was town last game, has changed tactics this game and is not longer game 1 Happy. Pmj is the closest thing to Game 1 Happy - which was Town.

Also as I've already said, my main goal in this game (at least for Day 1) is to actually find Town as opposed to hunting scum. Last game I narrowed down 3 mafia candidates on Day 1 - all of which were town and one of which was an awful lynch (Cheeseums), and another that would have been awful to lynch because she was actually really good later on (Nebulous). If we lynched Ruminator and she flipped green, I think I would have just laughed.

Not to mention, all my other soft-scum reads on Day 1 were also Town. I read Sinny, ESC and Helvete all as potential mafia. In a pool of 12 players last game, I made reads on 50% of the players and didn't hit a single mafia even by chance.

Suffice to say, my ability to actually find mafia Day 1 is undeniably shit, so I have to use different tactics and have different goals. So instead of being on super high-alert and hammering at every single inconsistency, I'm trying to find Town and make sure we don't lynch any of the people I think are Town*



Is this addressed to reluctantly? He posted the stuff I said that I read as Town on like Day 1 of Day 1. But he was out of the way, no one was really targeting him so I didn't see a need to defend him. I don't even see what's weird about protesting a wagon that you disagree with?

Which list are you even talking about? Do you mean this post?

Read the first fucking line.

"Okay firstly, there's too many lurkers still. Not by post-count, by actual contribution."

I don't consider someone a lurker just because they make a small number of posts, if the posts they're making are informative and useful and/or indicate what their alignment is.

Reluctantly looks town, despite low posts.



My Day 1 goal is to lynch mafia, but with the awareness that it's unlikely I'm going to be right about any of my reads Day 1. So as an added caveat, I don't want to lynch useful Town either. The thing is, this just increases the chances of hitting mafia anyway imo, because instead of just going off, "I think these people might be scum", I'm building a case off of a group that I think are scum (will lynch gladly) but also a group that I think are town (I won't lynch Day 1).

Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't. But at the very least I'm not going to be lynching the Cheeseums of the game, ridding town of an active member and leaving a town with as many actives as lurkers - because it's impossible to even win at that point.

ABWOP: the point being that Urakro fits that category of active and not worth Day 1 lynching. If we're gonna make a mistake, I'd rather we make a mistake on someone not even useful as opposed to someone useful.

Who I don't want to lynch Day 1:

Jenny
Hado
Gopher
Zerkalo
Urakro
Reluctantly

Either because they're active and it'd be stupid OR because I think they're high chance of town (which would be stupid). I'm going to avoid voting those people because I think it's just bad process.

Also, special mention to Blarraun who doesn't officially make the list but has been pretty active in his short time in the game.

Hado
I'm not really concerned with, "proving myself town" though. I'm playing a game that puts me in a good position to make reads down the track, because I'm pretty certain that I can make better reads than majority of people in the game once the game progresses to a certain point.

Yes, even you. I think you're better at this game overall. You're more experienced, have better understanding of the ins and outs of the game - but I'm better at reads and I don't think being good at reads is a thing that manifests as much through experience in mafia in particular, since reading people isn't a mafia-exclusive skill. It's a game that probably improves it, but they're two separate things.

Thing is that a lot of your reads come on 'scumtells' and shit like that, but the thing is that half the shit you tell me is a scumtell, isn't seen as a scumtell when I look at various other mafia games on other forums. So I can't be bothered fucking around with, "X behaviour has Y connotation" because I don't think it's at all reliable.

In another game, with another kind of player and in another kind of context - I'd see Reluctantly's behaviour as scummy because it looks like he's cop/doc-hunting. But I don't think he is this game. So when you say, "this is a scumtell" I don't buy it. I think there's behaviours that genuinely need to be encouraged or discouraged (martyring - yes) but that they aren't necessarily scumtells.

It's the fact that martyring is such an unhelpful NO-TELL that makes us discourage it. Once someone does that, all bets are off. If they're town they're just being dumb and refusing to help, because they should be absolutely spending all of their energy trying to direct us the right way and providing their reads - so that when they die and flip green, we can now confirm all their opinions and thoughts were honestly for the benefit of town.

But, that doesn't mean town don't do it. So it's good we've discouraged it, and for the record I'm not going to let anyone get away with it. Anyone who pulls an ESC gets voted, I don't give a fuck either. But if that's not expressly established at the start of the game, it's not a scumtell.

Yeah my confidence in Day 1 reads took a hit, but my confidence in later-game reads got a boost, since I picked Zerkalo + Puffy pretty easily at start of Day 2. I let you pull me off Zerkalo to ESC because you seemed really sure, and while I don't necessarily disagree with how you play (hardcore scumhunt 24/7) I don't agree that it's the right style for me.



I have two easy tells, you and Reluctantly. Reluctantly's strategy shtick isn't what mafia do. If mafia cop hunt or try to pass off as being town by posting strategies and whatnot, then their follow-up behaviours are also going to be things to try and make them look more town (because it looks retarded to just come in, post a bunch of shit about power roles and then disappear for another 24 hours like he did).

At least, I don't register him as trying hard to look town. I don't read either scum intent or any inconsistency in anything he says.



In that case, I'll justify why before I thought you were town and why now I'm almost certain you're town.

When I sheeped you I figured you'd be suspicious and 'turn' on me for it. It's what both town and mafia Hado would do, so that's not what sold it. Especially since Gopher is in the game, I had to confirm that you weren't bussing each other and were both mafia or else I couldn't play this card because you'd both just support the sheeping and ride me all the way to victory. There'd be no way town could beat a Gopher-Hado mafia combo with me sheeping (no offence town).

Town Hado turns on me, because he's genuinely suspicious about my sheep. He has a case and needs to rule out that I'm conveniently sheeping him just to play last game's meta.

Mafia Hado turns suspicion on me, because he knows there's potential that someone (Gopher especially) will see straight through the sheep and recognize the danger of potential mafia Hado having Town RB sheep him all game. It's going to divide Town. Mafia Hado knows that Gopher knows this, so Hado turns on me first to clear himself of guilt.

The difference though, is that mafia Hado would never say this:



It's a sore spot that I'm digging at by saying you just outright can't beat me if you're mafia, and if you're mafia you're not going to defend it like that because if I'm sheeping you and calling you town, mafia Hado wouldn't plant the seed that, "Actually I could beat you dick." - because if you're really mafia and I sheep you, then you already KNOW that you're winning and you can just sit there smugly and ride my misplaced arrogance to victory.

So you're town, and I'd implore others that even if I get lynched by Hado - when I flip green, please don't reflexively lynch him in response. Thanks.

Obviously none of this makes me more green, but when and if I die then you'll at least know you can trust Hado.

Helvete
I read him as 50/50 town/mafia, just because of the style he posted in - but he's actually done nothing necessarily pro-town.

Also a lot of my lack of suspicion was to do with thinking he was quite new and wouldn't have the guts to play the "wee look at me I'm such a mafia!" shtick - but it turns out he's got quite a decent background of experience. So he probably DOES have the guts to do it and being time-poor then (he's one of the few I believe on this account) if he really was a mafia he'd probably need to play some kind of weird gambit to throw people off from the beginning.

Urakro
I don't consider Jenny off the hook, but out of the people who've been inactive/had apparent issues with other commitments, she's been making a concerted effort to do stuff.

She hasn't flaked at all when she's said she wants to do stuff and to me she has the same PmjPmj stupid-but-not-mafia read that I had for him. Except Jenny's actually a new player and I doubt she'd play it that way more than I doubt it for Pmj. To me they're both basically the same player at this point (in terms of output, not personality) but I have a higher (about 70% vs. 50/50) scum read on one than I do the other - so I don't want to lynch Jenny.

I don't have her on either a high scum read, nor being really inconsistent and weird Town - so I don't want to lynch her.

Am here, I actually don't understand this shit.

@Reluctantly why are you voting Zerkalo? Is she a very high scum read or do you dislike the Happy train that much? Those are the only two reasons you'd risk a no-lynch at this point. I'm going to vote for a lynch, I was hoping Happy would turn up although at this point he doesn't have enough time to make a real case.

Okay, here's the thing:

Neither Helvete or Reluctantly are suddenly targeting Zerkalo out of self-preservation that I can tell, because it's Happy who's at risk of lynching, not them. Please quickly summarise why you want to lynch Zerkalo because she's on my "no-lynch" list for level of activity (and the implication that it makes her unlikely to be mafia) but not necessarily for lack of scumminess.

I prefer lynching Happy because he's playing outside his style and really doing nothing to help. How do you have Zerkalo on SUCH a high scum read that you'd risk a no-lynch?

Fuck it, it doesn't really matter why you're suddenly off Happy. It can be analysed Day 2.

(Shadow Vote Happy - I won't let a no-lynch happen.)

ABWOP: that doesn't mean you get away with not explaining it.

Okay I think I know what's bugging me.

Zerkalo is voting Helvete, despite the fact Helvete is actually here and making some effort to help (or just self-preservation, but it doesn't look like typical townie self-preservation to me) and Reluctantly is voting Zerkalo because he doesn't seem the suspicion as legit. Am I right?

I'm saying it's not strange and it looks like more town and not the typical self-preservation you'd see from both town and mafia. You're not martyring either, so that's nice. I want to know why Zerkalo sees it more fit to vote Helvete because I actually understand why Reluctantly wants to vote Zerkalo for wanting to vote Helvete over Happy too.

She's been railing on lurkers but now wants to vote the less-lurking lurker.

Vote Happy

Day 1 vote analysis:



I actually voted Happy to make sure the lynch went through, as per Gopher's suggestion, so it's 8 on Happy.

Out of these, the ones who I was suspicious of on Day 1 were Sinny, Helvete and Gopher. Helvete's conftown now. Sinny and Gopher are not.

I eased up on the Gopher case because I remember after Game 1, going back and seeing just how and what ESC had done that could have tipped me off to him being town and stopped my tunnel. Amid his endless inconsistencies, there's at least method and a style not outside of his personality. On top of that, there wasn't any evidence of ESC voting in a townie lynching.

As far as I'm concerned, 3 strikes (of the good kind) meant that while it still would have been really hard for me to ignore a lot of the potentially scummy shit he was putting out - I could have gone for better targets. I let myself get distracted by town and despite the fact I had 2 other people correctly predicted as mafia, I stopped pressuring them. At that point if by Day 3 he still hadn't even voted, well fuck it - because that actually is just really scummy. He didn't do that though.

Any-fucking-way my point is that neither Gopher nor Sinny exhibit these good strikes. And this isn't about comparison to the last game either, that's just the only mafia game I've played so I don't talk about my 'experience' I just reference the last game. These are general behaviours that in conjunction point to scumminess.

But now, Gopher - how much am I supposed to let slip by on the basis that your meta-game is to have an inconsistent persona and not make any real headway. Why should anyone be expected to legitimately spend an entire game struggling to read you, with you doing little to nothing in the way of making clear and concise posts?

The weirdest shit ever for me, was this: Gopher starts calling out Sinny for being inconsistent, then Sinny calls Gopher town.

?

How does that even work. Sinny? I've been avoiding you Day 1 because I wanted to not start an argument at a point in the game where we have zero information and it could all just be pointless, but how does this make sense? If you're Town, how does being called inconsistent and potentially scummy make you think someone is actually Town? it's out of character with everything you've done before and shit, everything I know about your personality: when someone calls you scummy, you call them scum right back. You do this everywhere on the forum, but in this particular thread you're suddenly unsure of yourself.

To add to that, I can buy this bus. I'm not going to speculate before ONE of them flips red but there's another peculiar thing about this:

If you look at the actual voting order on QuickTwist's post, you see that right after Gopher votes Happy - Sinny UNVOTES Bronto. How fucking obvious a mafia ploy is this?

Gopher is taking the lurker route of targeting, and Sinny is taking cues from the experienced player. If Sinny were mafia, she'd have no problem following Gopher's lead based on their personalities and Sinny's not exactly the type to fuck around and be non-obvious about her intentions.

Gopher: you're massively inconsistent, all I read from you is WIFOM and to put it in your own words: if you really were red, you wouldn't read as red. Yeah, you'd just read as one big case of mentally disarming fucking nothing. Despite being the most active poster in the thread, you're giving me sweet fuck-all.

Which is why I used the votes last game to cut through the bullshit - voting patterns don't lie. Lynches are a massively chaotic point in the game, and it's one where mafia are completely exposed. If they go for a no-lynch, it's dead-fucking-obvious that they're playing against town (or a lurker - which you weren't), so they're forced to vote and they're forced to make sure that the lynch hits Town - all shit that you have for sure done.

Plus, on Day 1 without the luxury of having fleshed out strategy - it's the best time to catch mafia acting in unison out of confusion as to what they really should be doing. They've got the choice of contradicting their buddies unplanned, or going along with them.

Voting patterns are exactly how I cut through the bullshit and nailed both Zerkalo AND Puffy at the very start of Day 2 - so in this area of the game I'm confident. They gave some very small but not really telling reads on Day 1, but the voting just gives that shit away. It ties all the little inconsistencies together, where my incorrect reads of Ruminator and ESC didn't - neither of them voted Town.

Both of you are doing all of the shit that tells me you're scum.

Vote Gopher


I don't find that to be a scumtell Reluctantly. I've seen that done in many, many games. It's a way for people to see what Helvete had said and why he might get NK'd.

Yeah a point of reference helps but it's also really cumbersome and it's not like the post is unhelpful. I still don't buy a Hado + Gopher bus, and my own reasoning tells me Gopher is the active scum here, not Hado.

Sinny I swear to god if you don't even have suspicions of Gopher you're as scum as they come (I did a rhyme). Don't fucking OMGUS me and try make this into a thing about me.

Even with mistakes, in Game 1 I put effort into investigating 4 of my reads and I was right on 2/4. I like to think that with Ruminator basically fucking AFK that she's not even relevant, so on the 3 reads I made on actual active players I was correct on 2/3.

Voting patterns don't lie.

Also, what does this even mean?

No shit, that's exactly my point? In Game 1 you didn't vote on a Townie lynch and you just staunchly and stubbornly held to your views. Now suddenly you're letting someone sway your votes - and better yet - you're not even suspicious of them for it?

Sinny agreeing with Gopher - okay I buy that.
Sinny agreeing with Gopher after he pushes us to lynch Town? Not. Fucking. Buying. It.

Hado
I don't want this game to be RB vs. the world again, so make points by all means. If you're just +1'ing me on Gopher then that's fine.

Also to be honest I didn't even read your Gopher case when I saw how long it was. Last game I was convinced to lynch Cheeseums and also to switch to ESC. I even made my point that the ESC-wagon smelled fishy as fuck on Day 2, but you seemed really fucking damn sure.

Cheeseums totally understandable, Day 1, have to start somewhere and he even self-voted so...whatever. But ESC could have been avoided - and I'll just outright admit I'm blatantly saying that from hindsight and that I was overall no better. It doesn't matter if I had the right reads if I didn't put my vote where my reads were, but I want to avoid that this game.

The thing is, even though I think you're Town - I know you relatively well and it's too easy for me to understand your intentions and therefore agree with your output. I need to have my filters unsullied to be able to play this game properly.

Also: I told you I'd never let you live it down that you switched me off of my Zerkalo tunnel and onto ESC, and I was being dead serious :^)

I will not stop tunneling my good reads just because someone else who I think is town also has good reads. Last game I had zero experience so I deferred to a more adept player, this game my experience is limited, but it's still verifiable evidence of my competence at reading people.

Fine because as mentioned, I didn't read your case but I peeked the spoiler and it's fucking long. I don't think you're faking your Gopher suspicion, so I don't think I'd be in danger of being sheeped by a scum Hado. Plus I don't even read you as scummy at this point so that's a double okay for me.

Reluctantly
Did anyone ever think Zerkalo was mafia apart from me either? Not even the fucking spectators thought Zerkalo was mafia - but voting patterns don't lie. Mafia can't collude on Day 1, they don't have meaningful time to plan strategy. It's the best time to catch them red-fucking-handed and I caught Zerkalo + Puffy last game using the same process.

Zerkalo last game threw out these stupid little, "oh noooo we lynched a Townie wow so sad :'(" (not word for word, but basically the gist of it)

Zerkalo is caring, but she's not some fucking vapid twat - but can I make a legitimate argument out of such a small thing that people would believe? No. Literally no one would have believed me if I said she put out a giant scumtell from that stupid little sentence.

But scumtells DO come in that form and you CAN find them, just as long as you understand the player, the context and then have something concrete to tie it to: voting patterns.

What I want to know is, why do you think Gopher's inconsistency can just be explained away by stupid shit like, "haha I'm an ENTP ;)"

Then when I question him on it, he turns around and says:

"Oh just kidding bro, it's just a silly in-joke that I shouldn't have made."

No shit. He fucking knows it was a slip that Town Gopher wouldn't make. He might have inconsistencies (we all do) but there's small tells that don't fit with people's personalities. Town Gopher doesn't make that comment, because it's a shitty excuse and creates confusion. It doesn't make him look red, it just makes things into wifom.

He doesn't make a more obvious slip like Zerkalo because he's more experienced, but he's not other-worldly experienced. He's about 7 or 8 games experienced, he's still going to slip.

If you want to make a case on why I'm scum for hunting scum (lmfao), go ahead and make one. I'll be waiting.

Also, what about Sinny? Your thoughts on her? FWIW: I still read you as town.

:mad:!!!!!!

Okay, pretend my last response wasn't a thing then and we can start over.

Gopher
Except you can't scream at Sinny in Day 1. There's literally no way you could prevent this happening, and it's exactly what I'd expect a tag-team of Sinny + Gopher to look like.

You'd have no way of stopping it and the lynch-wagon coming from you would make her join you.

The thing is that I'm inclined to agree with you on how Sinny would play mafia. The problem is that her playing mafia this way is contingent on her having a mafia player on her team who she'd be willing to actually follow and who she wouldn't rebel against as an authority figure. That list isn't a big list.

Reluctantly
Fair points.

What has Gopher actually done this game to present to you as Town though? Apart from sheer activity, where has he done things that actually look Town? If you can read him, sincere congratulations because I can't penetrate that filter.

He put a countdown timer in his signature, okay? He asks people questions about what they think about other people. Cool. What does he DO though. Regardless of playstyle, surely he's going to DO something?

He's got a case coming now, conveniently after he adopts the wait and see method after Day starts. But why? It apparently prevents others from jumping on his wagon - it just as easily lets him jump on a wagon too. What's to stop him just doing the same thing?

Hado:
Yeah but she actually hasn't been consistent, she's flipped on you and a bunch of other people. That's what you're missing.



Last game she decided you were an authority figure and no amount of pleading or niceties even remotely swayed her. Okay maybe she's learnt? I can't allow you to think that, because it's not solid gameplay, it's personal. You want to believe you "won" this situation and that she, "learned".

She didn't, she's just playing the game like scum.



I don't think so. I think again that it's not how a person brand new to playing scum would play, not even Sinny. Furthermore, if you think Gopher is scum then I honestly have no idea how you DON'T see Sinny as scum.

If you thought Gopher was town then I'd understand it. What am I missing where you suspect Gopher as scum but somehow don't suspect Sinny as scum? You know what, even IF Gopher flips green, I'm STILL gunning for Sinny because Gopher's right - Sinny could do this to town as well. I'm just really fucking sure that she's doing to to mafia.

They both implicate each other here, is what I'm saying. Lynch either one, I don't even care - but I'm not letting these reads out of my sight unless some kind of fucking amazing piece of evidence arises that tells me how not-scum they are.

Well - okay, but if they can't use it during Day 1, my points are still valid.

PMJ
Er, no. "He talks too much" is a shitty scumtell.

Try again.

Ika
Only if you can explain how you can play 3 games of mafia at once and not have an aneurysm :D


Going to bed as well. Occurs to me that this game is coming to the end of page 19 at the start of Day 2, and the 1st game only just reached 21 pages by day 3.5.

No wonder I feel burnt-out. I'm gonna try keep to a schedule of posting around the time I wake up, have breakfast and get some errands out of the way until I have stuff to do at night (so like 230pm-5pm AEST) and then jump on again before going to bed (from like 1130pm-1230am AEST) to check how things are going. That's like 3-4 hours per day where I can be active and keep up with thread.
 

PmjPmj

Full of stars.
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
1,396
---
Location
UK
@PMJ
I'm not an awful player.

Correct or incorrect, that's your opinion and I'm still not going to buy anything you say, so do yourself a favour and save your breath. Fact is, nobody wants to jump on the Hado bandwaggon, so maybe I'm the shit and misguided player. Who knows. I wouldn't be surprised.

As for your contribution:

1) I think you overestimate yourself; a lot of what you post isn't really all that insightful

2) congrats on not being as busy in RL as me?

Utter bullshit.

Whatever. I'm sticking by my guns; you smell of shit. I think I'm done with this game for the next 12 hours or so, because I have a mountain of work to get through.

:storks:
 

QuickTwist

Spiritual "Woo"
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
7,182
---
Location
...

Sinny91

Banned
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
May 16, 2015
Messages
6,299
---
Location
Birmingham, UK
Correct or incorrect, that's your opinion and I'm still not going to buy anything you say, so do yourself a favour and save your breath. Fact is, nobody wants to jump on the Hado bandwaggon, so maybe I'm the shit and misguided player. Who knows. I wouldn't be surprised.

As for your contribution:

1) I think you overestimate yourself; a lot of what you post isn't really all that insightful

2) congrats on not being as busy in RL as me?

Utter bullshit.

Whatever. I'm sticking by my guns; you smell of shit. I think I'm done with this game for the next 12 hours or so, because I have a mountain of work to get through.

:storks:

Could you not share any more reads before you go? I'm not sure any one can dissuade you from your fears of Hado, but I would implore you not to get completely hung up on him either.
 

Rook

enter text
Local time
Today 10:52 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,544
---
Location
look at flag
*Moves into Blar's abandoned shack*

Well then, I have received my role.
Gopher, Urakro and Sinny correctly determined Cheese's(RookBlar's) role.

[I apologize if I failed to mention someone else who directly pegged Puffs as a townie, I am only on page 5 of the entire thread]

From what I have read so far and since following more recent developments, I have formed opinions as to who seems suspicious and who truly wants to aid the town with constructive analysis.

Those who give helpful analysis may be mafia successfully creating a facade of sincerity and the suspicious folk may be citizens.
Regardless, I will soon post a list of my hunches after reading some more.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
Huzzah, it looks like I have space to breathe again, LOL!
Gopher -- you tellin' me you couldn't whittle that down a bit? Maybe more later. I need to reread.

To follow up with Hado briefly:
I withhold some views. Tactically. Previous times I've withheld have turned out okay right?

While still withholding 10%, I've still contributed a hell (and I mean a metric fucking hell) of a lot more than you. Or most people here even. It's pretty obvious I'm not withholding because I'm afraid to post. So you keep focusing on the fact that I'm not giving 100% while still not reaching half of the 90% I have given freely.

Not to mention that as mafia I could easily avoid giving useful answers to these questions without arousing suspicion.

For example, just not mentioning Blarraun, instead of saying specifically that I have some thoughts on Blarraun that I'm not giving. See how much easier that would have been for a scum Hado?

ehhhh.... I mean, yeah, of course that makes sense, Hado, taken on its own merits. Some people would be terrified to dance out on that kind of thin little cable.

The thing is, I don't think it's much of a stretch for you to post like this. let me talk about my metric for a second.

I watch you guys on the forum when Inquisitor and other folks have started a big to-do, and you're typically one of the guys in there slugging it out with long posts. It's a facet of personality; you like to build the elaborate cases, you like to prove people wrong, you're not afraid to get in someone's grill, you throw your weight around a bit even as a mod. Some people like to be out there. I think you have to be in motion, and I think reining yourself in to lurk for Day 1 was really painful for you (and if I had to go back and find Quotes I'm sure I could, but I think it's kind of obvious to everyone at this point).

It's all about personality and seeing what is easy for someone versus hard. I know you've got a knack for this game. It doesn't mean you're scum, but it does mean I have to acknowledge you can run circles around me and if you WANTED to, probably sucker me somehow. Anyway, I think it's easier for you to put that 90% out there; it's how you work.

Not everyone is that way in this game, some of us have had to stretch like hell to comply with the expectations for gameplay to prove our salt. Urak, for example, seems to fit the personality profile I had for him off-game, and while he's done a few things that seemed extreme (like when he went straight for Blar's throat coming into game), Blar was also targeting him to help egg on the behavior, and what it felt to me was like Urak was "trying on" that kind of strategy and just didn't expect Blar to flip out and dump the game. The degree of remorse he showed afterwards seem appropriate in that kind of situation, like he was stretching to "try on" that aggressive strategy that wasn't a norm. Same thing with Hel (who I really did not know much about, I had a blank in my mind from forum interaction), the ambiguity was notably bad in early play, but once he actually stepped up, there was a difference between empty posts and being a person who just sits in the conceptual current and feels his way around, so it was finally like I got a sense of him and put him lower on my list for Day 1. wasn't sure until the flip.

Summary: I'm not weighing folks by a GENERAL expectation of what a "hypothetical someone" would do, I am comparing to the individual expectation developing for each player.

So yes, you are doing more than other people right now, but that doesn't mean I automatically cut you slack; your bar happens to be higher in that area because you're a natural for it and even thrive on it. That and the 'confusion' factor is still leaving me wary.


RE: Thoughts on Sinny: She was okay out of the gate, then had a weird period of apathy. It got her a red rock in my basket. It's possible she got on a bender and crashed, or got sick, or had a shit day at work. She looks pretty much back to snuff in the last day or two, so my hackles have dropped a bit ... for the moment.


Re: Blar: Keeping it succinct: Looks like he read the first few pages of the game, then skimmed the rest and tried to toss in a high-level "dip my toes in the water" assess that comes off as partly random because he just hadn't read enough. Then he tossed a grenade at Urk because he wasn't sure how to proceed with the game at that stage, and it blew up in his face, so he bailed. So Town Blar = sloppy play, Scum Blar = sowing confusion, like the Mafia version of the old "Aristocrats" joke. I already described my thoughts about Urak in that scenario.

Rook, when you catch up -- if you were casting a vote against someone today, who are your top two choices and why? I don't feel like Cheeseums or Blar gave us much; it's up to you, dude.



...You know, this time of day is more my pace. I can sit here and think, write up my thoughts, and not worry that I'm already 40-50 posts behind again.
 

Rook

enter text
Local time
Today 10:52 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,544
---
Location
look at flag
Rook, when you catch up -- if you were casting a vote against someone today, who are your top two choices and why? I don't feel like Cheeseums or Blar gave us much; it's up to you, dude.

I'm compiling a ranked list, but as of now a definite suspect in me mind is Urakro.
Before the list, I shall supply some of their posts that felt very...stilted in my mind, language I usually associate with a cover-up or desperate attempts to convince others.

The Blar incident is also very sketchy now that I know the role he held, so that would probably be my first vote.

A verdict, however, will only be reached after I go through all the Urakro communiques, there may be some truly genuine contribution that I have not yer read and the language Blarblunder
may simply be ingrained factors or mere blunders.


hmm, well then, first this investigation before the list I suppose.
 

Sinny91

Banned
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
May 16, 2015
Messages
6,299
---
Location
Birmingham, UK
RE: Thoughts on Sinny: She was okay out of the gate, then had a weird period of apathy. It got her a red rock in my basket. It's possible she got on a bender and crashed, or got sick, or had a shit day at work. She looks pretty much back to snuff in the last day or two, so my hackles have dropped a bit ... for the moment.

Youknow, as much as I try to deny it, I am human.
 

Ex-User (11125)

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Feb 8, 2015
Messages
1,532
---
Hado are you just obfuscating the thread with your blarraun question? I mean ure not even asking "what do you think of the exchange between urakro and blar?", youre asking others to analyse blar specifically. What is the point of asking others to analyse blarraun's behaviour and alignment?...we need not even guess anymore...
 

Rook

enter text
Local time
Today 10:52 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,544
---
Location
look at flag
I have a compulsion for good language : /

Rook:

"...there may be some truly genuine contributions that I have not yet read and the language and Blarblunder
may simply be ingrained factors or mere mistakes."
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
BTW, I see what the pattern is now: With Happy and Helvete down, Hado will be the next to go.

(Then we're out of the letter "H" so I have no idea what happens next.)

:storks:
 

Rook

enter text
Local time
Today 10:52 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,544
---
Location
look at flag
BTW, I see what the pattern is now: With Happy and Helvete down, Hado will be the next to go.

(Then we're out of the letter "H" so I have no idea what happens next.)

:storks:

I noticed that yesterday ^.^

Hmmm... "Hook", Hennywocky", "Herkalo", "Hedbaron"....

Groovy.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
Youknow, as much as I try to deny it, I am human.

Damn, I was hoping you were a robot.

Because how great would that be for me? Knowing a fucking robot?

I'm compiling a ranked list, but as of now a definite suspect in me mind is Urakro.

Before the list, I shall supply some of their posts that felt very...stilted in my mind, language I usually associate with a cover-up or desperate attempts to convince others.

The Blar incident is also very sketchy now that I know the role he held, so that would probably be my first vote.

A verdict, however, will only be reached after I go through all the Urakro communiques, there may be some truly genuine contribution that I have not yer read and the language Blarblunder may simply be ingrained factors or mere blunders.

hmm, well then, first this investigation before the list I suppose.

Srsly?? Not only was that fast, but shocking as well. He scans decently green to me, as you probably just noted from my last posts.

I know you have to read a ton to process all that's gone down, but yes, I do want to hear your reasoning on this.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
Hado are you just obfuscating the thread with your blarraun question? I mean ure not even asking "what do you think of the exchange between urakro and blar?", youre asking others to analyse blar specifically. What is the point of asking others to analyse blarraun's behaviour and alignment?...we need not even guess anymore...

What, because Rook claimed Town?
(at least, that's what I got out of his first post.)


I noticed that yesterday ^.^

Hmmm... "Hook", Hennywocky", "Herkalo", "Hedbaron"....

Groovy.

I do think it was gentlemanly of you to block that first shot with your own body, but I refuse to dive in front of Zerk...
 

Sinny91

Banned
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
May 16, 2015
Messages
6,299
---
Location
Birmingham, UK
Damn, I was hoping you were a robot.

Because how great would that be for me? Knowing a fucking robot?

Erm... Not as great as knowing me (?!) :phear: :D
 

Rook

enter text
Local time
Today 10:52 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,544
---
Location
look at flag
Damn, I was hoping you were a robot.

Because how great would that be for me? Knowing a fucking robot?



Srsly?? Not only was that fast, but shocking as well. He scans decently green to me, as you probably just noted from my last posts.

I know you have to read a ton to process all that's gone down, but yes, I do want to hear your reasoning on this.

I became suspicious after I read the posts directly after Blar's exit, and today more so after reading their first posts, which seemed to be very robotic statements aimed at convincing others that hey had only the best interests of the town at mind.

More research is required though, because I know Hado, who is undoubtedly more experienced then me, pegged Urakro as town, as have you and...one or tow?...others.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
Lynch this botch plsthx

Oh, so we're back to that now? First the snipe on day one, and now because I won't take a bullet for you, you're gonna push a lynch on me even in jest?

... waiting for the door slam. (because that's what you do when you get pressed, you kind of duck out the back door.)
 

Ex-User (11125)

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Feb 8, 2015
Messages
1,532
---
No I'm actually thinking you're town now. You and probably hado too...For not noticing that rook is now confirmed town
 

Rook

enter text
Local time
Today 10:52 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,544
---
Location
look at flag
and today more so after reading their first posts, which seemed to be very robotic statements aimed at convincing others that hey had only the best interests of the town at mind.
.

Ok, after re-reading their first posts, I have determined that those can not be used as evidence.
I seem to have been projecting my previously formed opinions after the Blar fiasco.

My suspicions were that Urakro's first posts were inspired by an outside thread on how to be a productive member of the town, or how to appear like one.

I am still suspicious however, pending judgment.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
I became suspicious after I read the posts directly after Blar's exit, and today more so after reading their first posts, which seemed to be very robotic statements aimed at convincing others that hey had only the best interests of the town at mind.

More research is required though, because I know Hado, who is undoubtedly more experienced then me, pegged Urakro as town, as have you and...one or tow?...others.

yes, that's exactly why I want to hear your logic after more reading. Two eyes are better than one... and an Argus-ian cluster of eyes far better.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
No I'm actually thinking you're town now. You and probably hado too...For not noticing that rook is now confirmed town

Oh look, you're still here. :phear:

...But yes, I'm still confused on this. I'm kind of torn between asking for more out of curiosity versus not asking because I don't know how the rules work in this regard. So consider this me not wanting to risk the wrath of QT at the moment and not asking.:kodama1:
 

Ex-User (11125)

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Feb 8, 2015
Messages
1,532
---
Rook not getting his role pm until after the start of day 2 means he's not mafia :phear:
Thank you QT for making my life easier XD ♡
I know I'm town, jenny and hado are most probably town too for not noticing the above. and rook and Helvete are confirmed town. So that leaves:
Ika
Sinny
Urakro
Reluctantly
Gopher
Breadboard
Pmj

Out of the above, pmj and ika did not vote happy
That means atleast 1 of the remaining pool is scum
 

Ex-User (11125)

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Feb 8, 2015
Messages
1,532
---
Out of the remaining pool, RB and Reluctantly are the most green. Jenny do you agree with me?
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
Rook not getting his role pm until after the start of day 2 means he's not mafia :phear:
Thank you QT for making my life easier XD ♡

I think I need more coffee, it is not clicking for me. (Bad Jenny!)

So he gets it after Day 2 starts.

If he was Town, it wouldn't matter, right? He missed the Day 1 vote, but he could be NK'ed like everyone else. So for Town it wouldn't change much unless he was a role; he just wouldn't get the PM until Day 2.

And if he was scum, he'd just miss the night actions, I guess. But I don't think that would limit them unless of course he had a role.

Sorry for being confused... but I'm totes not getting this.
 

Ex-User (11125)

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Feb 8, 2015
Messages
1,532
---
Errm i was thinking if rook was scum, wouldn't his buddies ask why he's not on the chat? Umm nvm yeah you're right this is not necessarily true
 

Rook

enter text
Local time
Today 10:52 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,544
---
Location
look at flag
@Zerk

Jenny is right, as there 2 goons, NK would still occur as only 1 is needed to kill.

I could also have been the roleblocker, as there is no way to detect their absence from one night of play.

The only way this argument would be valid is if Quicktwist places heavy emphasis on giving mafia their roles right away, but this is not determinable as I doubt QT would weigh in on such a decision as it could radically effect the game by confirming a player's role without doubts remaining.

Puff, Blar and I were appointed as members of the town, but I don't think QT's delayed supplying of the role can definitively absolve me. (May be an interesting question for the more experienced players to answer)
 

Rook

enter text
Local time
Today 10:52 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,544
---
Location
look at flag
afik, they talk with mafia at night, but decide who to block on their own.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
Errm i was thinking if rook was scum, wouldn't his buddies ask why he's not on the chat? Umm nvm yeah you're right this is not necessarily true

Gaaaa. See? This is what I'm talking about. Are you just missing things, or are you actively trying to mess with my head? >_>

Out of the remaining pool, RB and Reluctantly are the most green. Jenny do you agree with me?

And yeah, I've already been really skeptical of you, and pretty much right on schedule after I mention this earlier today here you come kind of sidling up to me ...

For Town's sake:

- Reluctantly. So far mostly green. She (is that right, Reluctantly? sorry if I'm wrong) comes across as new to the game like me and has had some variations in play, but in a sense that scans Town because it's not all processed and smoothed out. She's just who she is. That gives Town points, in my mind. Making some mistakes, but the sense I get is that it is all for Town. I can do a more formal assess, if required.

- RB. Geez. Just been standing back at the moment. He is kind of the planet that is whirling around the double sun known as HadoGopher and stuck in their gravity. He's fearless, I will TOTALLY give him that, he doesn't care how he's read. For example: The whole voteflip Gopher/Sinny thing ... Do you know how crazy that sounds? I mean, sure, in this game anything is possible ... but is it likely, knowing what I know of Sinny? Both Sinny and Gopher have some scumplay by nature, but this particular plot seems a little thin to me. But the fearlessness makes him either baldfaced scum or kamikazee Town, since he figures even if he doesn't make it, he's going to take scum out with him. And it's par for course even for his Town behavior, he has consistently played this way. I have him more green than red at the moment.
 

Sinny91

Banned
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
May 16, 2015
Messages
6,299
---
Location
Birmingham, UK
Gaaaa. See? This is what I'm talking about. Are you just missing things, or are you actively trying to mess with my head? >_>



And yeah, I've already been really skeptical of you, and pretty much right on schedule after I mention this earlier today here you come kind of sidling up to me ...

For Town's sake:

- Reluctantly. So far mostly green. She (is that right, Reluctantly? sorry if I'm wrong) comes across as new to the game like me and has had some variations in play, but in a sense that scans Town because it's not all processed and smoothed out. She's just who she is. That gives Town points, in my mind. Making some mistakes, but the sense I get is that it is all for Town. I can do a more formal assess, if required.

- RB. Geez. Just been standing back at the moment. He is kind of the planet that is whirling around the double sun known as HadoGopher and stuck in their gravity. He's fearless, I will TOTALLY give him that, he doesn't care how he's read. For example: The whole voteflip Gopher/Sinny thing ... Do you know how crazy that sounds? I mean, sure, in this game anything is possible ... but is it likely, knowing what I know of Sinny? Both Sinny and Gopher have some scumplay by nature, but this particular plot seems a little thin to me. But the fearlessness makes him either baldfaced scum or kamikazee Town, since he figures even if he doesn't make it, he's going to take scum out with him. And it's par for course even for his Town behavior, he has consistently played this way. I have him more green than red at the moment.

This RB orbiting Hado/Gopher thing... Has peeked my spidey senses, I have an idea. But want some time to try and case it first, because at first, it does sound rather... Conspiratorial.
 

Ex-User (11125)

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Feb 8, 2015
Messages
1,532
---
Gaaaa. See? This is what I'm talking about. Are you just missing things, or are you actively trying to mess with my head? >_>



And yeah, I've already been really skeptical of you, and pretty much right on schedule after I mention this earlier today here you come kind of sidling up to me ...
Nooo im not :'c I really thought that roleblocker and the other 2 mafia have one chat and work together :'c
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
As a side note, I thought Urakro was pretty green, but it will depend on his continuing involvement and what he says throughout Day 2.

Nooo im not :'c I really thought that roleblocker and the other 2 mafia have one chat and work together :'c

>_>

It's just weird.

Here is a bit of possibly irrelevant minutia but it keeps coming back to mind:
I don't remember if you had that Blade Runner avatar before I picked my cigar-smoker, but suddenly I noticed you had changed your avatar to a smoker as well. (If you changed before i did, then sorry.) And after a few days I got bored (since I had picked the avatar as part of the ENTP conpiracy, regarding the "I Am ENTP" thread on the forum), so I swapped it out for my current fallback "Death of the Endless" avs and suddenly you change your avatar to something else as well, no longer a smoker. it's little things like this along with your playstyle where I feel like I am being shadowed by you on and off, along with the "we we we" comments.

I mean, I'm flattered, but trust has to go both ways, and I haven't even come close to vetting you yet.

And then you hand me a list of five players and ask me which are the "most green," with the insinuation that the lowest ones on the list are likely to be scum.

The thing is that (1) I know what I am, but I don't know what you are, so you're still on my observation list regardless of who you voted for, and (2) just because Ika and Rook didn't vote Happy doesn't mean they're not scum, we still have to figure them out, and (3) Pretty much everyone on the list you gave me have some degree of green, there's no one I'd say, "Oh, yeah, I'm REALLY suspicious right now of them." The lowest ones on that five-person list might just feel scummy because their playstyles are inherently scummy to me. And of course it was a leading question: (4) "Don't you agree that so-and-so are the most two green folks in that list?"

You also tried to push a lynch towards Hel who ended being confirmed town. On one hand, I get it if you found Hel's playstyle suspicious -- i was wary of it at first, and Hado and others didn't like it either. And like I said, Reluctantly's angle on the NK seemed too WIFOM for my taste.

On the other hand, you seem to create a lot of problems everywhere you show up, with misinformation, misdirection, not answering questions, or asking very leading questions. (Reluctantly had to harangue you in the past to get some responses.) Did you have any kind of response in terms of criticisms about how you are approaching this game? I think I've asked this generally of you before, but you never replied.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
Also, @PMJ -- I reread all your posts.

You already know I have some beef with Hado, as I've posted... I have issues with that whole little clusterfuck because I just can't sift through it yet.

Then again, you're not telling me anything I don't already know with him. Plus, you're riding on strength of personality to have me hop on the wagon. And it's not like you've even vetted yourself but are setting yourself up as the hero.

Moah posts, plz.
 

PmjPmj

Full of stars.
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
1,396
---
Location
UK
Also, @PMJ -- I reread all your posts.

You already know I have some beef with Hado, as I've posted... I have issues with that whole little clusterfuck because I just can't sift through it yet.

Then again, you're not telling me anything I don't already know with him. Plus, you're riding on strength of personality to have me hop on the wagon. And it's not like you've even vetted yourself but are setting yourself up as the hero.

Moah posts, plz.

No, I'm not setting myself up as a hero. I very clearly stated that it was my intention to lay out my suspicions and then get other people to review Hado if they so wish. I do not recall you ever calling him out on anything, so either you did and I missed it, or you had a chance to highlight your own concerns and didn't.

So, which one is it?

(AFKish apologies. Up to my eyes in paint).
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
Anyway, was home early today and spent some time here. I have to go do my other work most of the evening now, although I will check in later (it's about 5pm here). Tomorrow and weds I will be at work all day, so possibly not as much as I posted today... but will be reading.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
PMJ, I hit Hado with some stuff after you left today, I believe...

The big problem is that he and Gopher produce so much text and are off focusing on each other to some degree that it's hard to read, parse, and respond to directly. I'm left with more the after-effect of their engagements, versus going through and picking quote after quote after quote.
 

Rook

enter text
Local time
Today 10:52 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,544
---
Location
look at flag
Ok, the Urakro case is taking longer than I thought (This game will be one hell of a time-sink)

So here's my list based on more than half of the thread that i have read:


Probably town:

Reluctantly
Jenny

[I have found them to provide sincere analysis and generally act constructively in their dealings]

Perhaps town:
Redbaron
Gopher

[There is definitely a sincerity to class the broader field of citizens, but some tangential elements in their conduct has not inspired within me the same confidence as of the players above]

Unknown:

Ika
Zerkalo
Sinny

[I am on the see-saw with these, Ika because of their little content, Sinny seems sincere but more study of her interactions are needed, I am slightly befuddled by Zerk but thus far no devious leanings have been detected]

Special Note:
Hadoblado

[Hado has given some solid analysis of players, but sometimes he seems to bring some elements into
the whole, such as the Gopher interplay, the confuses me when reading through the thread. This may merely be that, as a new player, I am not familiar with deeper aspects of the game, but I remain greatly uncertain of Hado, and would like a broader field of view from him regarding other players]

Under investigation:
Urakro

Under suspicion:
Pmj

{I am aware that pmj has outside pressures, but I would like more solid contributions from them. There
have been a scant few, but under the timeframe more is needed for pmj to be a constructive element towards the town}
 

Ex-User (11125)

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Feb 8, 2015
Messages
1,532
---
Here is a bit of possibly irrelevant minutia but it keeps coming back to mind:
I don't remember if you had that Blade Runner avatar before I picked my cigar-smoker, but suddenly I noticed you had changed your avatar to a smoker as well. (If you changed before i did, then sorry.) And after a few days I got bored (since I had picked the avatar as part of the ENTP conpiracy, regarding the "I Am ENTP" thread on the forum), so I swapped it out for my current fallback "Death of the Endless" avs and suddenly you change your avatar to something else as well, no longer a smoker. it's little things like this along with your playstyle where I feel like I am being shadowed by you on and off, along with the "we we we" comments.
This is ridiculous. I feel ridiculous even having to explain something like this. My blade runner avatar had nothing to do with you, it was inspired by my recent conversations with a scanner darkly and his blade runner profile pic. If you're so curious to know, I did change my avatar before you did, I remember checking the sign up thread a couple of times after I did and you hadn't changed your avatar yet. I don't even know why you're assuming I'm shadowing you lol I felt like swapping out later and it's not like you're the only one who did. This is all so irrelevant but it does make me annoyed that you think I'm shadowing you wtf...i dont know what you mean about the we we we thing, you mean the exchange of jokes? I thought we were joking around...if it makes you feel any better i really was joking around and never meant any of the jokey crap i said to you. I thought you knew this because you always seem to initiate the joking...

I mean, I'm flattered, but trust has to go both ways, and I haven't even come close to vetting you yet.
In light of the stuff above i think this comment has a personal dimension to it and I'm not liking this one bit.


The thing is that (1) I know what I am, but I don't know what you are, so you're still on my observation list regardless of who you voted for, and (2) just because Ika and Rook didn't vote Happy doesn't mean they're not scum, we still have to figure them out, and (3) Pretty much everyone on the list you gave me have some degree of green, there's no one I'd say, "Oh, yeah, I'm REALLY suspicious right now of them." The lowest ones on that five-person list might just feel scummy because their playstyles are inherently scummy to me. And of course it was a leading question: (4) "Don't you agree that so-and-so are the most two green folks in that list?"
Ok i did say I fucked up so obviously I'm taking it back

You also tried to push a lynch towards Hel who ended being confirmed town. On one hand, I get it if you found Hel's playstyle suspicious -- i was wary of it at first, and Hado and others didn't like it either. And like I said, Reluctantly's angle on the NK seemed too WIFOM for my taste.
I know i fucked up with my Helvete push. And I'm sorry for that.

On the other hand, you seem to create a lot of problems everywhere you show up, with misinformation, misdirection, not answering questions, or asking very leading questions. (Reluctantly had to harangue you in the past to get some responses.) Did you have any kind of response in terms of criticisms about how you are approaching this game? I think I've asked this generally of you before, but you never replied.

Ouch. Am I really playing that horribly? I misunderstood Reluctantly's question and it delayed the answers because i had zero idea what he wanted me to answer. ..until he quoted the bits.
Okay it's not really the criticism that is making me feel hurt, it's more the stuff at the beginning of your post...combined with the criticism at the end i think im being an annoyance to everyone. i think i understand what blarraun said about feeling unwanted. Sorry everyone

QT i know you've had to deal with this shit enough since the start of this game but im out
 

Urakro

~
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
466
---
As a side note, I thought Urakro was pretty green, but it will depend on his continuing involvement and what he says throughout Day 2.

I don't want to spam this thread like I did day 1. Also, I do want to get right up and start questioning rook. But each time I try to question someone, I also lose a piece of my dignity in the process. For instance, I do a third person on myself, and realise that I'm being emotionally manipulative. Also, being wrong is humiliating, but I face it because it's pretty much the name of this game.

You guys have amazing insights, and I'm really confident you all can work it all out. There's 7 of you town, against 3 mafia, me being the eighth town. Sometimes, I can get really worked up and have a hard time stopping.

When I was in the spec QT for last game, Quick Twist and that other more experienced player gave some good advice. Quick Twist mentioned that it was really important to be confident in this game, I'm assuming he meant no matter which role you have. The other guy said it was important not to stick your paranoia on one person, (in reference to ESC), but to stop and try alternatives, or start railing and questioning as many people as you can.

One insight I had, is that there is probably no good or bad moves in this game. It's merely a butterfly effect, in that each contribution (no matter how small, how weak or strong an argument) changes the outcomes drastically. Hado said I'm trying too hard to be clever, but really I haven't actually put any effort into making tactics or plans. I just don't care if what I say is right or wrong, I'm just looking for what changed, and if I can spot any recurring patterns.

Because I have my own perspective in this game, I had my suspicions and poked them with a stick, and I have unique results out of it.

I poked gopher, and he answers my questions. To me he remains calm and tries to answer them clearly. I poke zerkalo (and I did get a response), and she was like she didn't even know I was railing on her. I poke reluctantly, and kind of jokingly he's like yeah, let's go bud, give me whatcha got. That actually sounded like fun, but continuing on I poked Blaurran and he does a PaulMaster. That was humiliating, and now I really question my own methods. Half-heartedly, I poked Helvete, and he asks me questions or tries to answer mine.

Night Phase happens, and I play with the idea of Hado screwing with everyone. And it was weird how that really clicked in an odd way as maybe being quite plausible.

So I start the day poking him, but I ain't gonna do what I did yesterday. I think I spammed this place enough for 3 whole mafia days, and I'd like to see what everyone else does without me. So I'm leaving it all in your court. Though I was planning on making a comeback when the lynch is going to happen. But yeah, for me, less talking, more listening.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
Argggg.

.... I know I sounded like a bitch. From a game perspective, everyone has an angle. I just wanted a response so I could evaluate the playstyle better; it's a game overall. I'm sorry if I fucked this up, and sorry that I pissed off Zerk in the process, I didn't mean for it to be personal but after reading see that it could easily be taken that way.

:facepalm:
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 3:52 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
I don't want to spam this thread like I did day 1. Also, I do want to get right up and start questioning rook. But each time I try to question someone, I also lose a piece of my dignity in the process. For instance, I do a third person on myself, and realise that I'm being emotionally manipulative. Also, being wrong is humiliating, but I face it because it's pretty much the name of this game....

Yeah. I get it. Now, obviously. Sigh. I feel like shit myself, or just find myself doing things that are part of a game but (AKA some forms of aggression) that feel intuitively wrong for me personally and possibly I suck at them so I do them wrong....
 

Sinny91

Banned
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
May 16, 2015
Messages
6,299
---
Location
Birmingham, UK
I didn't think you sounded like a bitch at all, but then again..
 

PmjPmj

Full of stars.
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
1,396
---
Location
UK
People are rage-qutting now?

It's a game. On the internet.

@Rook - Good, I'm glad you suspect me. Now make a case, if you wish. Happy to annihilate it for you.

I'm off to bed. Have fun.

p.s. stop rage quitting and get some balls. Fuck sake.
 
Top Bottom