Apologies for the incredibly delayed post. I’m at work and a coworker is here so I actually have to look busy instead of fucking around here.
I am playing almost exactly the way I play mafia. However I play mafia the way I play town.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dc5c/3dc5c4ffbe4ca8e5e0f4c3e25668c26f96e55480" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
was this meant to be intentionally unhelpful or is it just that "saying absolutely nothing but making it look like you're saying something" sense of humor you have.
Okay what's your opinion on Hado so far?
Step 1: Come lurk with me
Step 2: ???
Step 3: Town win!!
Why won't anyone lurk with me? You people are no fun.
Who's on then? Let's start.
I was planning on lurking more, but just realised I'm not available tomorrow night to make up for it. So I need to do more now.
I’m confused by his stated intention to lurk at the beginning. It fundamentally goes against his previously held convictions that lurking=anti-town. Granted, in a later post he explains that he had intentions for a particular strategy that fell through, but it’s worth being wary of.
1) Asking people about strategy is stupid. Read a guide.
2) If a single one of you idiots votes for yourself you earn my vote immediately as well. So many people voted for themselves last game, but it is pure emotional manipulation/wifom. If you are town, and you martyr this way, then you're shit town. I encourage others to do the same. You shouldn't ever put yourself in a position where this is your only option left. Just hunt scum, as this action serves as both your offense and your defense. My first priority for lynching is manipulative martyrs.
5) @Everyone that played last game, and who specced
You've all played now. I hope you understand that there is good reason for lynching everyday now that you've heard experts say it in the QT who you didn't have reason to suspect were misleading you. I'm trusting that we can unanimously agree that a lynch day one is a useful thing to do.
6) @Everybody
I know you want to do clever things. You can do those clever things, but do so while also hunting scum. If you do not pressure the people around you, this makes you look scummy in my eyes. I would point to kingbossscummafia puffy as the perfect example from last game. He was highly agreeable and rational, but ultimately none of his actions reflected a mindset of someone actually looking for who was mafia.
Seems par-for-the-course Hado. One small thing worth noting is that he cautions against trying to be clever even though he was crafting some special strategy at first. Granted, he’s one of the most experienced players, so he has some more leeway on trying to be clever.
Jenny's done nothing to look like town. I didn't expect her to do so by now so that's fine. Null read.
FOS urakro
You've said a lot of words but all of them have encouraged others to do the thinking for you. I want to see what you think.
Gopher. What do you think of my read on Urakro?
That's a bit wishy washy Zerkalo. What level of read allows you to lynch someone? If someone's a 50/50 in your mind you'd lynch them right?
Seemingly standard Hado
@Gopher
I had some intentions. They would have been fun. I'm not going to explain them because I might use that strategy in some other game, and since it didn't actually happen, it's irrelevant.
Why are you interested in why I wanted to lurk more? How could that possibly lead you to a read? What response would a mafia hado say that a town hado wouldn't, given that both had just admitted and rescinded that intention?
Because dwelling on details of games that failed to happen doesn't seem productive. Reasoning please.
Dwelling on things that haven’t happened isn’t necessarily productive, sure. But the fact that you wanted them to happen and then changed your mind/the circumstances means there’s got to be some kind of thought process behind that. A thought process best made clear and concrete, as it can give us a glimpse at how exactly your plan was pro-town and how exactly your change is more pro-town
Oh... you're right. Or about as right as I was (24 hours off). We need to lynch within 3 days. Which also means I could have lurked more...
QT, could we please get a countdown in the OP?
That moment when you refer to Sinny as being herself, then realise that it was Cheeseumpuffs all along.
I'll consider this evidence to my previous point Cheeseumpuffs. I know it's in fun etc., but it can, has, and will cause confusion. Town Cheeseumpuffs wouldn't want to cause confusion.
A 50/50 is not a null.
Null is a 3/13. A 50/50 is a 6.5/13. 50% certainty is a pretty strong read.
Not super useful posts (for getting a read), imo
I too would be interested in what Happy has to say about zerks stance on lynching.
After Happy is done, I want to hear what gopher thinks about it too.
Yes specifically after Happy. I don't want to tread on Helvete's toes.
I've got my read. Specifically on you Gopher. Providing you with answers would entail me pushing a case on you, which I'm not ready to do yet. I need to see you work for a while longer. It's been a long time since we played together, and I think we were both scum at the time. So I've got to re-read you.
I'm reluctant to make this game as much about me as the last one was, and if I'm the first one to push a hard case it very well could be. I'm content to wait and allow the town to get their shit together.
Tell you what I'll make you a deal? I'll make 'the case' regardless, even if I change my mind and think you come out town. But I don't do it until I have more information. This case will include my thought process from this point in the game, so that you know this isn't me just bullshitting so I don't have to provide anything.
Seems like standard Hado. Asking questions of other people, stating his suspicions but still keeping them relatively close to the chest. I’m super curious to see his case against Goph.
For the record, I'm almost certain the difficulties Artsu spoke of last game were genuine. I don't expect anyone here to lurk to a similar degree.
No response.
@QT
Please don't tell us who the 13th is. I could infer things from that information that could be unfair.
I don’t know what he could infer that would be unfair. He gets the same information that everyone else does. If he can make inferences that no one else can, then that makes him a step ahead which I wouldn’t say is unfair. It’s odd to not capitalize on something which could put you ahead.
That said, it doesn’t say much to his townliness, just his ego.
Thanks on both counts QT! I think I might put that link in my sig so it's ever-present.
Anything.
No response.
unFOS Urakro
Not because you're acting like town, but because your approach is expected this early in the game. This is the same slack I'm cutting Jenny.
Making the game more complicated is a bad idea. It'd be good if we were all well practiced, but people are learning, and the chances town are going to fuck up badly when you turn up the difficulty? Almost certain.
That said having rules that make it harder for mafia is a really good idea, it's like you approached the right conclusion from a different direction. Stuff like:
- don't lurk
- hunt scum
- don't vote for yourself
- don't create needless confusion
- make a lynch every day
Are all things that town should be able to pressure mafia into agreeing to. In that they can't reasonably refuse without attracting suspicion. Meaning town gets to control the terms and conditions without even knowing who town are.
So yeah, you're kind of on the money, but you're still not thinking in practical terms. You want to mess with the fundamental laws of the game when you haven't learned the simple version. Understandable, but not useful.
@Erryone
This all may seem like a bunch of faffing around, but several meaningful things have already happened. I've got a read on Gopher, and I've got another of similar weight that I'm yet to mention. I'm not making a case on either yet, because I need to see action from the less proactive crowd. Last game went to shit for multiple reasons, but one of them was that multiple people didn't see the value in posting early. Yes a lot of it will be pointless fluff and posturing, but from that seemingly mindless shittery comes intuitions and genuine reads. Don't expect me to make the cases for you. If I see people making real cases day one, then there's almost no way I'm pushing for their lynch. It's hard to make meaningful cases when you're inexperienced, but 10 times harder for an inexperienced mafia. So it's worth the effort.
@Blueroles (cop and medic)
It's especially important you read guides. I'm not going to tell you specifics, though I might think it's a good idea I say something later (it's up to you whether you listen). You have a higher value than the average vanilla town. Do not mention blueroles. It is a common tell due to availability bias. Read the guides as a lot rides on you.
Standard Hado. Nothing that really deviates from his usual rhetoric.
Unvoting pmjpmj is what I'd do if I was rb. Why? Because pmjpmj has now promised to be active through precedent. Bronto has done no such thing, therefore given RB's anti-lurker tendencies, it's consistent for him to switch vote onto Bronto.
Not that I have a town read on RB, but I do see both addressed claims as false.
Yeah, I understand his reasoning. I just thought it worth questioning.
@The people who are floundering
You must have suspicions. Try to act in such a way as to test those suspicions. Do it of your own accord and this will help you look town while also helping your understanding of who's mafia. For instance, I suspect Gopher, I asked him a question which he will soon answer. I have an idea of what his answers might mean. If I fail to adjust my read from what he says, I've still forced someone to say things that they can be held to later. For instance, if Gopher says that the reasoning for Zerk's ideas about lynching are terrible, a scum gopher no longer has the option to support any notion that works on the same principle as Zerk's ideas. You deny them wiggle room, which limits their power, even if you don't know they're scum.
It is the people who refuse to be limited in this way that we lynch, because they're trying to keep their options open for future lies.
Standard
--------------------------------------
All in all I don’t see Hado really deviating from his play last game. Yes, he’s making a pointed effort to take up less of the spotlight than last game, but he’s been saying that was his intention since early on in the last game.
At the moment I have a slight town read on Hado, but I also know he’s experienced enough that he’d be able to act reasonably town-like if he were mafia. He’s far from being a prime target for today’s lynch, as he’s contributing and (apparently) forming cases that we should be seeing soon.
One thing I want to note in regards to Hado, though, is that he’s very slippery. There were multiple times in the last game that he used the same manipulative tactics that he called other people out on but was able to deflect a lot of the attention away from that fact. I don’t think it’s necessary to call him out on every little thing he does, but I think that if anyone has suspicions of him and builds a case, they should be mindful of this and do their best to not give him any wiggle room.