Late2theParty
Active Member
I've been reading a lot about Ti vs Te. I think I have a pretty clear understanding of what Te does and what activities that utilize a lot of Te would be. But for Ti while I feel though I understand what it is... I'm not clear on what activities exclusively use Ti.
Here's a pretty good summary of Ti vs. Te for any who need to catch up...
If I wanted to work out my Ti what would I do? My logical skills need sharpening. It's been said we should spend as much time developing our main functions, because they will always be the easiest for us to use, and have little energy expenditure.
1) What are activities that use Ti exclusively(or close to exclusively)? If so, why?
2) What are the best ways to develop Ti?
Here's a pretty good summary of Ti vs. Te for any who need to catch up...
Ti is all about logical
consistency - internal logical relationships, and
categorizing things in terms of logic. Te is all about
logical implementation in the real world - Te is a bit of a
"task master". Conflicts you will see with Ti vs Te are
primarily that of Te dismissing anything Ti comes up with
that "doesn't work", while Ti will be poking holes in the
logical consistency of Te and cringe at the lack of
understanding of nuance - or how things are built up.
Present statistical evidence to a Te user, and they'll accept
it as is (there are exceptions, obviously) and then look at
the practical application of this evidence. Ti will take the
same statistics and analyze the validity of the statistical
claim - what information was surveyed, are there any points
of bias, are there factors that undermine the validity, does
it hold together?
Ti *wants* to implement logical systems, just like Te - but
Te is much better at it. [Healthy, well balanced] Te can
discriminate between what is relevant and not, while not
concerning itself so much about the exact logical
relationships underlying and building these concepts - while
Ti strives for absolute clarity of logic.
Ti is fantastic at theory - Ti-doms will be able to take a
grain of truth and elaborate theories, branch out logical
relationships etc. This can be wonderful. However, their
strength is also their weakness --- they can sometimes start
off their train of reasoning on a false assumption, and then
the logical elaborations and theories built on this will have
absolutely nothing to do with anything even resembling
"truth" or "reality" (it is the EXACT same thing with Fi-
doms, just a matter of Fi-doms doing the same thing with
emotions).
Te is fantastic at logical implementation - at it's best they
will effortlessly implement logical systems, apply and
execute plans strategically and systematically. Which can be
wonderful. But, just like with Ti-doms, their strength is
also their weakness --- they can sometimes rely on faulty
"objective evidence" or draw conclusions on "the best ways"
too quickly and the result is then also going to be harmful
to their overall goal, both to themselves and others.
consistency - internal logical relationships, and
categorizing things in terms of logic. Te is all about
logical implementation in the real world - Te is a bit of a
"task master". Conflicts you will see with Ti vs Te are
primarily that of Te dismissing anything Ti comes up with
that "doesn't work", while Ti will be poking holes in the
logical consistency of Te and cringe at the lack of
understanding of nuance - or how things are built up.
Present statistical evidence to a Te user, and they'll accept
it as is (there are exceptions, obviously) and then look at
the practical application of this evidence. Ti will take the
same statistics and analyze the validity of the statistical
claim - what information was surveyed, are there any points
of bias, are there factors that undermine the validity, does
it hold together?
Ti *wants* to implement logical systems, just like Te - but
Te is much better at it. [Healthy, well balanced] Te can
discriminate between what is relevant and not, while not
concerning itself so much about the exact logical
relationships underlying and building these concepts - while
Ti strives for absolute clarity of logic.
Ti is fantastic at theory - Ti-doms will be able to take a
grain of truth and elaborate theories, branch out logical
relationships etc. This can be wonderful. However, their
strength is also their weakness --- they can sometimes start
off their train of reasoning on a false assumption, and then
the logical elaborations and theories built on this will have
absolutely nothing to do with anything even resembling
"truth" or "reality" (it is the EXACT same thing with Fi-
doms, just a matter of Fi-doms doing the same thing with
emotions).
Te is fantastic at logical implementation - at it's best they
will effortlessly implement logical systems, apply and
execute plans strategically and systematically. Which can be
wonderful. But, just like with Ti-doms, their strength is
also their weakness --- they can sometimes rely on faulty
"objective evidence" or draw conclusions on "the best ways"
too quickly and the result is then also going to be harmful
to their overall goal, both to themselves and others.
If I wanted to work out my Ti what would I do? My logical skills need sharpening. It's been said we should spend as much time developing our main functions, because they will always be the easiest for us to use, and have little energy expenditure.
1) What are activities that use Ti exclusively(or close to exclusively)? If so, why?
2) What are the best ways to develop Ti?