Architect
Professional INTP
- Local time
- Today 12:29 AM
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2010
- Messages
- 6,691
I've long felt David Souter was a likely INTP. Intensely private, he never married and still lives on the farm he inherited from his parents. He famously avoided every public event he could, such as presidential inauguration ceremonies. He even looks like an ectomorphic INTP
David Souter Gets Rock Star Welcome, Offers Constitution Day Warning
Here's the idea that pulled him out of his reticent retirement
His thinking is relativistic. The conservative members of the court (SJ types undoubtably) advocate a strict literal interpretation of the Constitution. He advocates that meaning and interpretation of the Constitution as changing as people change (Ti-Ne kind of thinking).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbbf3/fbbf39140742b7001911f568d1464d7b0e47575b" alt="220px-DavidSouter.jpg"
David Souter Gets Rock Star Welcome, Offers Constitution Day Warning
the hearty clapping continued for another full minute and more. The intensely private Souter, who hasn't made any extended public remarks in his state since retiring three years ago, looked abashed at first -- then beamed. "Thank you, thank you," he said.
Here's the idea that pulled him out of his reticent retirement
It's an argument that Souter returned to time and again, that the meaning of the Constitution is found not only in its literal words or concepts, but in how they apply to Americans of the current era. "What we learned from Brown is that the facts can include the meaning of facts as people experience them, as long as we have the eyes to see that," he said. "And our capacity to see that changes over time."
This argument wasn't entirely new. Souter laid it out in a commencement speech at Harvard in 2010. In that same speech two years ago, he argued -- as he did again Friday -- that the Court often has to decide between two "legally Constitutionally recognized values that can be in conflict with each other. They both can't win all the time. The paradigm examples are the guarantees of liberty and equality."
His thinking is relativistic. The conservative members of the court (SJ types undoubtably) advocate a strict literal interpretation of the Constitution. He advocates that meaning and interpretation of the Constitution as changing as people change (Ti-Ne kind of thinking).