Breaking the Meta | Formalization & Structuring of Cognitive Function(s) | MBTI & BEYOND!

[TimeAsylums]

Cognitive Theory
Now, we combine and meta these two

Cognitive Theory​

• Te = Formal System
• Fe = Normative Ethics
• Se = Exteroceptive/Proprioceptive Senses
• Ne = Deductive Reasoning

• Ti = Informal Logic
• Fi = Virtue Ethics
• Si = Interoceptive Senses
• Ni = Inductive Reasoning

• Formal structure socionics

Notes​

• Dual process theory (N/S System 1; T/F System 2)
  • Psychohistory
    • Julian Jaynes
    • Lloyd deMause
• Why does the use of one function inhibit & repress its I/E opposite? (e.g., Te-Fi) - > Enantiodromia?
• Read Kurzweil
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neocortex
• Post #52
• Read BAP's UMS specifically Hierarchy, Fuzziness, Distance, Perspective, Motion
• AK's VMs
• A feeling is merely the neurotransmitters. An emotion is the F function's Top-down perception of it.
• Human Resources

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baddeley's_model_of_working_memory

[bIMGx=250]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ae/Working-memory-en.svg[/bIMGx]

The reason we are building meta/superstructure is because from there you can dissect, analyze, breakdown, and derive (see the infrastructure) easily.

 

[TimeAsylums]

We are currently dealing with Posts #51 + 52 (This and previous post)

Now the problems to think about and questions to be asking are

• HOW DOES THE FUCKING GODDAMN RHIZOME FUNCTION?!

• Determine relation, if any
  
  • No relation
    • is Baddeley's model arbitrary in relation to the cognitive functions?
  • Higher form
    • is Baddeley's model merely the further structuring/hierarchy of/over the cognitive functions? i.e., (employment of) personality
  • Lower form
    • is the model only a model of the cognitive employment itself, and therefore not a hierarchy, but beneath the functions?
  • same form
    • or are the functions and the model the same ~structure?

[ spoiler ] contains Relevant information from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baddeley's_model_of_working_memory

Spoiler

The central executive is a flexible system responsible for the control and regulation of cognitive processes. It has the following functions:
binding information from a number of sources into coherent episodes
coordination of the slave systems
shifting between tasks or retrieval strategies
selective attention and inhibition
It can be thought of as a supervisory system that controls cognitive processes and intervenes when they go astray.

The phonological loop (or "articulatory loop") as a whole deals with sound or phonological information. It consists of two parts: a short-term phonological store with auditory memory traces that are subject to rapid decay and an articulatory rehearsal component (sometimes called the articulatory loop) that can revive the memory traces.

Any auditory verbal information is assumed to enter automatically into the phonological store. Visually presented language can be transformed into phonological code by silent articulation and thereby be encoded into the phonological store. This transformation is facilitated by the articulatory control process. The phonological store acts as an "inner ear", remembering speech sounds in their temporal order, whilst the articulatory process acts as an "inner voice" and repeats the series of words (or other speech elements) on a loop to prevent them from decaying. The phonological loop may play a key role in the acquisition of vocabulary, particularly in the early childhood years.[3] It may also be vital for learning a second language.

The visuospatial sketchpad is assumed to hold information about what we see. It is used in the temporary storage and manipulation of spatial and visual information, such as remembering shapes and colours, or the location or speed of objects in space. It is also involved in tasks which involve planning of spatial movements, like planning one's way through a complex building. The visuospatial sketchpad can be divided into separate visual, spatial and possibly kinaesthetic (movement) components.

he visuospatial sketchpad can be further subdivided into two components:

1.The visual cache, which stores information about form and color.

2.The inner scribe, which deals with spatial and movement information. It also rehearses information in the visual cache and transfers information to the central executive.

dedicated to linking information across domains to form integrated units of visual, spatial, and verbal information with time sequencing (or chronological ordering), such as the memory of a story or a movie scene. The episodic buffer is also assumed to have links to long-term memory and semantic meaning.

 

[TBerg]

Is Thinking correlatable with the frontal lobe performing defense mechanistic suppression of inferior Feelings, or does Thinking organize our reality principle, thereby causing the Feelings to arrange themselves to react emotionally to a clearer, more objective reality?

The former correlates with many INTPs saying that they often don't recognize their own emotions and feeling empty inside. Nihilism, absurdism, stoicism, Buddhism, etc.

The latter correlates with the vision of many INTPs of becomg übermenschen and being able to take their wisdom and conquer themselves and others.

 

[TimeAsylums]

Formal Structure [Denotation] of Cognitive Functions

Why does the use of one function inhibit & repress its I/E opposite? (e.g., Te-Fi) - > Enantiodromia?

Is Thinking correlatable with the frontal lobe performing defense mechanistic suppression of inferior Feelings, or does Thinking organize our reality principle, thereby causing the Feelings to arrange themselves to react emotionally to a clearer, more objective reality?

That's the question presented

[bimgx=200]https://31.media.tumblr.com/cf782cb9a88a53aafdf26c83aeededad/tumblr_inline_n1cqblWgdt1rpr1t4.jpg[/bimgx]

That is, the question you presented can be broken into two pieces.

The first part was empirical

Is Thinking correlatable with the frontal lobe performing defense mechanistic suppression of inferior Feelings

The second part was psychological

does Thinking organize our reality principle, thereby causing the Feelings to arrange themselves to react emotionally to a clearer, more objective reality?

We are operating under the formal assumption that the empirical causes the psychological because I don't want to be a fucking nutcase,

therefore

both are viable




Formal structure theory is currently working stuck with on posts #51 + 52

 

[TimeAsylums]

Note

meta categorization ~ fuzzy logic

Fucking fuzzy logic must have been the union of Formal logic's binary(classical) logic + Informal Logic


This thread has been great at uniting the Te + Ti,

Note 2

For anyone who is wondering what the actual fuck is going on right now

TimeAsylums' Deductive Reasoning is gathering as much information as possible, his Informal Logic is attempting to make sure it is all at least informally logical. TimeAsylums has also assumed his formal explications is the use of Formal Logic

TA is seeking agreement reality via external validation

but I digress


Formal structure theory is currently working stuck with on posts #51 + 52

 

[TimeAsylums]

THIS POST NOT FORMALLY STRUCTURED

obligatory informal-loose understanding (macro)

the human brain being of the same substrate as the universe ->

consciousness (universe self awareness) ->

obviously limited to the human understanding ->

e.g., the description and creation of "Formal logic, Informal logic, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning," created because it is understood that way, but human understanding was describing human understanding via human understanding ->

(Massively different levels/meta of "objective/subjective.")

recursion

[bimgx=100]http://www.beautifulwalldecals.com/images/P/ART400FlowerOfLife.jpg[/bimgx]

[bimgx=200]http://harmonicresolution.com/torsionanimated.gif[/bimgx]

tl;dr

attempting to make a formal (MACRO) structure via Linguistics

Formal structure theory is currently being worked on posts #51 + 52

 

[TBerg]

Is the human mind a manifestation of the universe trying to understand itself?

 

[TimeAsylums]

Is the human mind a manifestation of the universe trying to understand itself?

no tahts fhucking retarded


Formal structure theory is currently being worked on posts #51 + 52

 

[TBerg]

no tahts fhucking retarded

sez ur meaney mowf

 

[Brontosaurie]

whY does

---||[JP*]]| ~ everything sorta look
---||[JP*]]| ~ "like"...

->>>> ;this

[?]

i highly doubt that's the spontaneous typing workflow or layout preference of your Ne and it clearly doesn't facilitate readability either.

this thread is the worst case of ego inflation i've seen in a while. not sure if THD is just having fun pumping TA up hoping to watch him explode, or genuinely shares his naïve arrogance.

anyway take care guys. you deserve better than eating your own feet then legs then cock then torso then arms then throat then mouth and going "WOW META" over it all.

 

[Ex-User (5841)]

shit ...so

...

Goddammit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyXCkjMBK70

 

[Ex-User (5841)]

whY does

---||[JP*]]| ~ everything sorta look
---||[JP*]]| ~ "like"...

->>>> ;this

[?]

i highly doubt that's the spontaneous typing workflow or layout preference of your Ne and it clearly doesn't facilitate readability either.

this thread is the worst case of ego inflation i've seen in a while. not sure if THD is just having fun pumping TA up hoping to watch him explode, or genuinely shares his naïve arrogance.

anyway take care guys. you deserve better than eating your own feet then legs then cock then torso then arms then throat then mouth and going "WOW META" over it all.

Anal-lysis follows synthesis, dear bronto. You're too early.

Is the human mind a manifestation of the universe trying to understand itself?

Sort of, in that each individual functions like that wonderful torus gif and the population of humanity does as well (both of these are reductionist though) and given the fractal nature of the universal hologram.

 

[Base groove]

you deserve better than eating your own feet then legs then cock then torso then arms then throat then mouth and going "WOW META" over it all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeDZKGiY9EU

 

[Brontosaurie]

Anal-lysis follows synthesis, dear bronto. You're too early.

"something something; disjointed incoherent namedropping implementation of epistemology concepts puts me on top of things; it's everyone else's fault when i don't make sense and don't have a point; [some obscure smartass way of framing a connection that's actually obvious and trivial to 80 % of this forum's frequenters]; contradictions are cool when i make them, blablabla"

 

[TimeAsylums]

Anal-lysis

That was my joke from ~3 months ago, mother fucker. Credit.

Sort of, in that each individual functions like that wonderful torus gif and the population of humanity does as well (both of these are reductionist though) and given the fractal nature of the universal hologram.

If you had better verbal explication, people wouldn't misunderstand you so much. <- LOL Te JOKE



Formal structure theory is currently being worked on posts #51 + 52

 

[Ex-User (5841)]

"something something; disjointed incoherent namedropping implementation of epistemology concepts put me on top of things; it's everyone else's fault when i don't make sense and don't have a point; [some obscure smartass way of framing a connection that's actually obvious and trivial to 80 % of this forum's frequenters]; contradictions are cool when i make them, blablabla"

My default allegory for this (since ~2008 btw) has been attempting to bring a tree stump up to speed.

Why don't you try? TA did... (and surely you respect/ed him more than I, at least initially)

Although I'm not sure what aux Ne would mean for your sanity afterwards.

That was my joke from ~3 months ago, mother fucker. Credit.

No, that was mine. Lysis is a cellular process, mandingo, not a psychological one. (It's on your VM wall that can still be accessed by any madmin we can convince to do such a petty task for us).

If you had a better visual comprehension you'd understand in a flash of light and a snap of fingers. *wiggles carrot on stick*

 

[TimeAsylums]

No, that was mine. Lysis is a cellular process, mandingo, not a psychological one. (It's on your VM wall that can still be accessed by any madmin we can convince to do such a petty task for us).

By responding, I am willfully adding entropy to my own thread dammit

but the truth must be known.

I made the first joke off of "analysis." I specifically said "ana," without, and "lysis" destruction. You then made the joke "anal," rectum, "lysis," destruction.

Arguably for two reasons my joke was superior
1- your joke came after the realization of mine
2- your joke had to add an extra "l."

bitch.



Formal structure theory is currently being worked on posts #51 + 52

 

[TimeAsylums]

FWIW

this formal structure -> book

will be fucking meta

ffs so much shit to read, I thought I read a lot with Jung, fml.


@THD, I'd appreciate the addition of any sources/links via the Human Resources (what they have to offer) (See Notes post #51)



Formal structure theory is currently being worked on posts #51 + 52

 

[Ex-User (5841)]

I specifically said "ana," without, and "lysis" destruction. You then made the joke "anal," rectum, "lysis," destruction.

Arguably for two reasons my joke was superior
1- your joke came after the realization of mine
2- your joke had to add an extra "l."

I accept your admission of defeat.

Anal-lysis

Mine was the product of a certain English Comp II assignment ~February 2009 while I was still a Marxist-Leninist. Twas originally in reference to the anal-retentive quality of analysis paralysis.

Ana = duck.

@THD, I'd appreciate the addition of any sources/links via the Human Resources (what they have to offer) (See Notes post #51)

Don't jump the gun, there.

 

[Black Rose]

FWIW

this formal structure -> book

will be fucking meta

ffs so much shit to read, I thought I read a lot with Jung, fml.

Give us a list to check on your progress.
How will you bind the system in apprehension of non that came before?

 

[Brontosaurie]

My default allegory for this (since ~2008 btw) has been attempting to bring a tree stump up to speed.

Why don't you try? TA did... (and surely you respect/ed him more than I, at least initially)

Although I'm not sure what aux Ne would mean for your sanity afterwards.
h

try what? gg allin perfected what you're dipping your toes in. try something new.

 

[TimeAsylums]

Give us a list to check on your progress.

I'll continually update/post only if i find anything useful/relevant in those sources

How will you bind the system in apprehension of non that came before?

I can't fully say that there isn't any that came before that I simply don't know about that are greater than these (e.g., I'm 110% sure AI >>>>), but anyway, continual formal structuring, ...I'll leave it up to Ne...and rape Te.



Formal structure theory is currently being worked on posts #51 + 52

 

[Ex-User (5841)]

moar entropies!!!

try what? gg allin perfected what you're dipping your toes in. try something new.

You're completely misreading me.

I'm not sure whether to use your momentum against you a la Lyra, or attempt an exorcism.

(Me typing ^this effectively allows your response to dictate my choice)

 

[TimeAsylums]

Should be last post before I go off to read that shit-list of stuff.

The points of building the superstructure(Denotation of Cognitive Functions + Cognitive Structure) are many.

-it is NOT to be esoteric (I have not prohibited anyone from contributing), the formal structure is meant to enhance the ease of understanding and comprehension, NOT make it harder. The problem with solely using informal and slightly unstructured understanding is in the definition itself, it lacks structure. Also, the formal structure is easier to build on.

-The higher the superstructure(higher meta), the easier the infrastructure(lower meta) will be analyzed/seen.

-heuristic as well


For all intensive purposes, this is simply now [Formal Structuring of Cognitive Theory]

[bimgx=200]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dd/Cognitive_Science_Hexagon.svg[/bimgx]

Formal structure theory is currently being worked on posts #51 + 52


Cognitive Theory is being worked on posts #51 + #52

 

[Brontosaurie]

moar entropies!!!

You're completely misreading me.

I'm not sure whether to use your momentum against you a la Lyra, or attempt an exorcism.

(Me typing ^this effectively allows your response to dictate my choice)

no, you completely miswrote you. idiot.

alt. response: no, you misread me.

 

[Base groove]

 

[Brontosaurie]

Should be last post before I go off to read that shit-list of stuff.

The points of building the superstructure(Denotation of Cognitive Functions + Cognitive Structure) are many.

-it is NOT to be esoteric (I have not prohibited anyone from contributing), the formal structure is meant to enhance the ease of understanding and comprehension, NOT make it harder. The problem with solely using informal and slightly unstructured understanding is in the definition itself, it lacks structure. Also, the formal structure is easier to build on.

-The higher the superstructure(higher meta), the easier the infrastructure(lower meta) will be analyzed/seen.

-heuristic as well


For all intensive purposes, this is simply now [Formal Structuring of Cognitive Theory]

[bimgx=200]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dd/Cognitive_Science_Hexagon.svg[/bimgx]

Formal structure theory is currently being worked on posts #51 + 52


Cognitive Theory is being worked on posts #51 + #52

you're not promoting ease of understanding and comprehension. can your visceral-cerebral Ne mojo fathom that?

 

[Base groove]

In all fairness I believe he just needs a chance to dump it all in one place with full intent on organizing everything, only to abandon it as soon as he's completed the dump because he's accidentally begun filling up again with some novelty.

There probably isn't even an underlying theory or any significant level of comprehension of what the patterns even mean, just that they are novel.

~ Edit ~ he seems to be master of the ????

 

[Ex-User (5841)]

This one's different because he won't be able to abandon it (his juices are swimming with mine, ffs...).

There probably isn't even an underlying theory or any significant level of comprehension of what the patterns even mean, just that they are novel.

Meaning is determined by purpose, which can only be applied after discovery and synthesis. Patience, oh INTJ.

Otherwise... so much jelly ITT...

 

[Base groove]

(his juices are swimming with mine, ffs...).

Gross you guys soggied the same biscuit?!?

Meaning is determined by purpose, which can only be applied after discovery and synthesis. Patience, oh INTJ.

Actually I am being patient and have indicated a few times (or so I would think) .. that I'm relatively inspired by the air of enthusiasm,

And I'm trying to help diffuse/smooth out the situation that has developed, but with very little regard for the consequences of my actions ...

 

[Brontosaurie]

i'm also trying to help diffuse/smooth out the situation.

 

[Black Rose]

i'm also trying to help diffuse/smooth out the situation.

combining diffuse concepts as larger aggregates is like finding the fundamental theory of all mental constructs in their diversity.

firsts sub system reference + second sub system reference = shared meta vocabulary of both references

TA shows this processes and asks for help when coming to the next level of meta.

currently hes at:
Jung + memory = ?

 

[Ex-User (5841)]

Spoiler

Should be last post before I go off to read that shit-list of stuff.

The points of building the superstructure(Denotation of Cognitive Functions + Cognitive Structure) are many.

-it is NOT to be esoteric (I have not prohibited anyone from contributing), the formal structure is meant to enhance the ease of understanding and comprehension, NOT make it harder. The problem with solely using informal and slightly unstructured understanding is in the definition itself, it lacks structure. Also, the formal structure is easier to build on.

-The higher the superstructure(higher meta), the easier the infrastructure(lower meta) will be analyzed/seen.

-heuristic as well


For all intensive purposes, this is simply now [Formal Structuring of Cognitive Theory]

[bimgx=200]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dd/Cognitive_Science_Hexagon.svg[/bimgx]

Formal structure theory is currently being worked on posts #51 + 52


Cognitive Theory is being worked on posts #51 + #52

So let's formalize the overarching process, then:

1. You identify formal structure of cognitive theory
2. Compare your skeleton with mine of systems ecology, via process of enantiodromia, and refine. At this point individual esotericism is forever lost.
3. Bridge the superstructures.
4. Build on the results, thus removing esotericism at higher levels of organization, if not entirely.
5. Cuil.

 

[Base groove]

What's that awful smell? *sniff*

Is it... stagnance?

 

[Ex-User (5841)]

Nah, that's me. I haven't changed my underwear in..... *checks calendar* 8 days.

 

[Brontosaurie]

Nah, that's me. I haven't changed my underwear in..... *checks calendar* 8 days.

very Ne to not keep track of underwear re-usage, you must be one hell of a brain

 

[Ex-User (5841)]

very Ne to not keep track of underwear re-usage, you must be one hell of a brain

$20 and I'll mail 'em to you.

(Nap time)

*EDIT: I admittedly have posters remorse after that one, but I'll let it stand in the name of authenticity. Apologies if it actually offends you.

 

[Base groove]

i'm also trying to help diffuse/smooth out the situation.

very Ne to not keep track of underwear re-usage, you must be one hell of a brain

 

[Brontosaurie]

didn't think you were a dickhead too.

whose side are you on?

 

[TBerg]

All I know is that this discussion is so.....meta, dude...meta.

/stonervoice

 

[Brontosaurie]

All I know is that this discussion is so.....meta, dude...meta.

/stonervoice

yeah they're fucking idiots

 

[Base groove]

didn't think you were a dickhead too.

whose side are you on?

yeah they're fucking idiots

Everybody here is on their own side and everybody here is a fucking idiot. Nobody here takes sides and every post has multiple meanings and multiple potential interpretations. Everything is done for lulz.

Personally, I am taking swings in every direction because I like to watch the school of fish scatter. So that makes me a dickhead. Ok. Well everybody here is a fucking dickhead. Including you Brontosaurie.

 

[Brontosaurie]

Everybody here is on their own side and everybody here is a fucking idiot. Nobody here takes sides and every post has multiple meanings and multiple potential interpretations. Everything is done for lulz.

that will be their final resort when all doubt about the foolishness of this endeavour has been cast aside. yes.

 

[TimeAsylums]

Spoiler

Cognitive Theory (macro)​

Spoiler

Fundamental Understanding:

Spoiler

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science

Cognitive science is the interdisciplinary scientific study of the mind and its processes.[1] It examines what cognition is, what it does and how it works. It includes research on intelligence and behavior, especially focusing on how information is represented, processed, and transformed (in faculties such as perception, language, memory, reasoning, and emotion) within nervous systems (human or other animal) and machines (e.g. computers). Cognitive science consists of multiple research disciplines, including psychology, artificial intelligence, philosophy, neuroscience, linguistics, and anthropology.[2] It spans many levels of analysis, from low-level learning and decision mechanisms to high-level logic and planning; from neural circuitry to modular brain organization. The fundamental concept of cognitive science is "that thinking can best be understood in terms of representational structures in the mind and computational procedures that operate on those structures."[2]

A central tenet of cognitive science is that a complete understanding of the mind/brain cannot be attained by studying only a single level.

Notes​

• My lists of “To Do/Notes,” are not chronologically or hierarchically ordered
  
  • The purpose of the Notes are a placeholder of things/ideas to be further integrated and formally structured into the hierarchy
    

• Syntax
  
  • ”[~]” Working on it
    
  • “[x]” complete
    
  • “[ ]” incomplete
    
  • “[?]” hmm
    

Cognitive Theory​

• Cognitive Functions
  

Spoiler

Fundamental assumptions​

All micro cognitive functions can be generalized into these macro cognitive functions [to which we simply refer to as “cognitive functions.”

Fundamental understanding​

Because the human mind is understanding via human understanding, it is understandable that the formal structural denotations of the cognitive function are lackings; the understanding is incomplete

• Te = Formal System
  
• Fe = Normative Ethics
  
• Se = Exteroceptive/Proprioceptive Senses
  
• Ne = Deductive Reasoning
  

• Ti = Informal Logic
  
• Fi = Virtue Ethics
  
• Si = Interoceptive Senses
  
• Ni = Inductive Reasoning
  

Notes​

• [ ] I have separated extraverted and introverted cognitive functions because I have not completed the formal understanding of “Why does the use of one function inhibit & repress its I/E opposite? (e.g., Te-Fi) - > Enantiodromia?”
  
• [ ] I need to integrate Model A from Formal structure socionics
  
• [x] Dual Process Theory (N/S [P] System 1; T/F [J] System 2)
  
  • [ ]Psychohistory
    • [ ] Julian Jaynes
    • [ ] Lloyd deMause
• [x] A feeling is merely the neurotransmitters. An emotion is the F function's Top-down perception of it. ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c1/Lövheim_cube_of_emotion.jpg)
  

• Pure speculation
  

Spoiler

• Note - Obviously the regions of the brain work together NOT independently (to be kept in mind when reading these)
  • Cerebellum > Se
  • Neocortex ~ [SYSTEM 2 Thinking (Dual Process Theory)] Te, Ti, Fe, Fi
    • Why F too? See the explanation of Emotion > feeling, a few notes up^^^ [It is the top-down perception of a feeling, not merely the feeling]
  • [?] Cerebral-cortex ?~? N?

• Consciousness
  

Spoiler

Fundamental understanding​

Hierarchy of pattern recognizers

• [~] Read Kurzweil
  
• [x] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neocortex
  
  • [ ] Find (most up-to-date) book on Neocortex
  • [ ] Most up-to-date book on Cogneuropsych
• [ ] Read BAP's UMS. specifically Hierarchy, Fuzziness, Distance, Perspective, Motion
  
• [?] Quantum Intentionality? (AnimeKitty/Dablob)
  
• [ ]Psychohistory
  • [ ] Julian Jaynes
  • [ ] Lloyd deMause
  
  

• MEMORY
  

Spoiler

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baddeley's_model_of_working_memory

[bIMGx=250]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ae/Working-memory-en.svg[/bIMGx]

The reason we are building meta/superstructure is because from there you can dissect, analyze, breakdown, and derive (see the infrastructure) easily.

Now the problems to think about and questions to be asking are

[*]Determine relation, if any

• No relation
  • is Baddeley's model arbitrary in relation to the cognitive functions?

• Higher form
  • is Baddeley's model merely the further structuring/hierarchy of/over the cognitive functions? i.e., (employment of) personality

• Lower form
  • is the model only a model of the cognitive employment itself, and therefore not a hierarchy, but beneath the functions?

• same form
  • or are the functions and the model the same ~structure?

[/list]

[ spoiler ] contains Relevant information from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baddeley's_model_of_working_memory

Spoiler

The central executive is a flexible system responsible for the control and regulation of cognitive processes. It has the following functions:
binding information from a number of sources into coherent episodes
coordination of the slave systems
shifting between tasks or retrieval strategies
selective attention and inhibition
It can be thought of as a supervisory system that controls cognitive processes and intervenes when they go astray.

The phonological loop (or "articulatory loop") as a whole deals with sound or phonological information. It consists of two parts: a short-term phonological store with auditory memory traces that are subject to rapid decay and an articulatory rehearsal component (sometimes called the articulatory loop) that can revive the memory traces.

Any auditory verbal information is assumed to enter automatically into the phonological store. Visually presented language can be transformed into phonological code by silent articulation and thereby be encoded into the phonological store. This transformation is facilitated by the articulatory control process. The phonological store acts as an "inner ear", remembering speech sounds in their temporal order, whilst the articulatory process acts as an "inner voice" and repeats the series of words (or other speech elements) on a loop to prevent them from decaying. The phonological loop may play a key role in the acquisition of vocabulary, particularly in the early childhood years.[3] It may also be vital for learning a second language.

The visuospatial sketchpad is assumed to hold information about what we see. It is used in the temporary storage and manipulation of spatial and visual information, such as remembering shapes and colours, or the location or speed of objects in space. It is also involved in tasks which involve planning of spatial movements, like planning one's way through a complex building. The visuospatial sketchpad can be divided into separate visual, spatial and possibly kinaesthetic (movement) components.

he visuospatial sketchpad can be further subdivided into two components:

1.The visual cache, which stores information about form and color.

2.The inner scribe, which deals with spatial and movement information. It also rehearses information in the visual cache and transfers information to the central executive.

dedicated to linking information across domains to form integrated units of visual, spatial, and verbal information with time sequencing (or chronological ordering), such as the memory of a story or a movie scene. The episodic buffer is also assumed to have links to long-term memory and semantic meaning.

the neocortex - the seat of consciousness, based off of that System 2 (J) Thinking should have arisen from here as well, and then making another assumption that (higher-level)memory was formed via the cognitive functions.

->

Basically, teh neocortex

tl;dr

neocortex

Superstructure complete

all infrastructure can be analyzed from here

tl;dr

neocortex


The Singularity ... I believe




FIN

 

[The Introvert]

Now this is the point. You fancy me mad. Madmen know nothing. But you should have seen me. You should have seen how wisely I proceeded --with what caution --with what foresight --with what dissimulation I went to work!

 

[Ex-User (5841)]

Now this is the point. You fancy me mad. Madmen know nothing. But you should have seen me. You should have seen how wisely I proceeded --with what caution --with what foresight --with what dissimulation I went to work!

I'm really liking the potential combined plot configuration interplay between this:

And the man was tall and stately in form, and was wrapped up from his shoulders to his feet in the toga of old Rome. And the outlines of his figure were indistinct --but his features were the features of a Deity; for the mantle of the night, and of the mist, and of the moon, and of the dew, had left uncovered the features of his face. And his brow was lofty with thought, and his eye wild with care; and, in the few furrows upon his cheek I read the fables of sorrow, and weariness, and disgust with mankind

and the next part:

I was never kinder to the old man than during the whole week before I killed him. And every night, about midnight, I turned the latch of his door and opened it --oh so gently! And then, when I had made an opening sufficient for my head, I put in a dark lantern, all closed, closed, that no light shone out, and then I thrust in my head. Oh, you would have laughed to see how cunningly I thrust it in! I moved it slowly --very, very slowly, so that I might not disturb the old man's sleep. It took me an hour to place my whole head within the opening so far that I could see him as he lay upon his bed. Ha! would a madman have been so wise as this

 

[Brontosaurie]

Spoiler

Cognitive Theory (macro)​

Spoiler

Fundamental Understanding:

Spoiler

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science

tl;dr

neocortex


The Singularity ... I believe




FIN

Spoiler

getting even dumber preparing to excuse it all as a joke, very predictable

 

[Ex-User (9086)]

getting even dumber preparing to excuse it all as a joke, very predictable

Man, what would you expect from armchair researchers?

And it has intrinsic value, because it shows where errors and bias can arise.

What matters is whether they can stay coherent in relation to their own model, if they can, then their model can be applied because all other models have similar shortcomings when it comes to research and empiricism.

Just sit back comfortably and enjoy the show.

 

[Base groove]

Telltale heart

 

[Ex-User (5841)]

What matters is whether they can stay coherent in relation to their own model, if they can, then their model can be applied because all other models have similar shortcomings when it comes to research and empiricism.

See... this is what I've discovered within my own realm, this coherence. It forms a fractal that repeats in absolute fucking brilliance. And that lucky bastard TA gets to put shit into actual words, even if he'll never see the space between the filamentous structures they create.

If the same fractal is found within TA's structure (and possibly Variform's [meaning the communication gap between me and everyone else finally gets Berlin walled]) then 1) we're on to something 2) we have a guide for further discovery via enantiodromia. If the fractal repeats, then you slew of Ti-doms and criticizers may actually be useful for once.