analytical praxeology typology

[Brontosaurie]

Ti: analysis
Fe: harmony
Fi: desire
Te: execution
Si: intent
Ne: challenge
Ni: ideal
Se: reality

function dynamic: dominant self, tertiary opposition by auxiliary use, inferior loss

dominant is subject, others are object

dominant a
tertiary b
auxiliary c
inferior d

grammatical form: a (verb) b (noun) through c (noun) at the expense of d (noun)

ESTP: realize harmony through analysis at the expense of ideal (example: negotiator)
ENFJ: harmonize reality through ideal at the expense of analysis (example: moralist)
ISFP: desire ideal through reality at the expense of execution (example: aspiring artist)
INFP: desire intent through challenge at the expense of execution (example: armchair philosopher)
ENTP: challenge harmony through analysis at the expense of intent (example: rebel without a cause)
ESTJ: execute challenge through intent at the expense of desire (example: careerist)
ENTJ: execute reality through ideal at the expense of desire (example: entrepreneur)
INTJ: idealize desire through execution at the expense of reality (example: psychotic)
INTP: analyze intent through challenge at the expense of harmony (example: paranoiac)
INFJ: idealize analysis through harmony at the expense of reality (example: scholar)
ISFJ: intend analysis through harmony at the expense of challenge (example: bystander)
ISTJ: intend desire through execution at the expense of challenge (example: follower)
ISTP: analyze ideal through reality at the expense of harmony (example: nerd)
ESFJ: harmonize challenge through intent at the expense of analysis (example: diplomat)
ENFP: challenge execution through desire at the expense of intent (example: hedonist)
ESFP: realize execution through desire at the expense of ideal (example: apprentice)

these are the analytical meanings of all types.

 

[Analyzer]

I like where you are going with this. But could you clarify the terms(challenge, intent)?

 

[onesteptwostep]

yeah I really like this bronto, it fits jung's interpretation of mbti nicely

the thing i often wonder about is how the other 4 remaining functions fit into his theory though

 

[Brontosaurie]

I like where you are going with this. But could you clarify the terms(challenge, intent)?

intent is what's been said, decided, to be done. attempt to build, to secure, and make reliable. to stabilize, institutionalize. inertia. decision. the current meanings, the prevailing ambitions.

challenge is to disrupt, to reconsider, to seek to replace.

 

[TBerg]

Are all brontosauruses thesauruses?

 

[Brontosaurie]

Are all brontosauruses thesauruses?

they's extingt y'ohh

 

[Analyzer]

intent is what's been said, decided, to be done. attempt to build, to secure, and make reliable. to stabilize, institutionalize. inertia. decision. the current meanings, the prevailing ambitions.

challenge is to disrupt, to reconsider, to seek to replace.

Cool.

I think another example for INTP would be a critic. Continuing with praxeology you could say paranoiac values come from having critical behavior. Critics make sense(a) of established frameworks(b) by presenting new perspectives(c), while neglecting feel good truisms(d).

 

[Yellow]

I think it's cool that you've created a formula for travel-sized summary of the different types. This is a prettily packaged idea, but I wonder if they could be expanded very slightly for clarity. Maybe I'm just slow, but I wasn't entirely sure what "realize harmony through analysis at the expense of ideal" meant on the first go-around. It took a few reads for everything you wrote to sink in.

 

[Sinny91]

Given my limited study of MBTI I think your descriptions are really accurate.
My 'home' forum banned me once for the challenges I brought to the table, and had gripes with the way I presented my idea's - with zero room for emotion in intellectual matters, and all my other INTP 'faults'. In the end, the forum had me back, because what I presented stood on it's own merit (which was realised ...in the end).. I really wish I could get those guys into MBTI so they could understand my thought processes better. I had to compromise by explaining myself in fluffier terms

INTP: analyze intent through challenge at the expense of harmony (example: paranoiac

Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not out to get you

 

[Brontosaurie]

Cool.

I think another example for INTP would be a critic. Continuing with praxeology you could say paranoiac values come from having critical behavior. Critics make sense(a) of established frameworks(b) by presenting new perspectives(c), while neglecting feel good truisms(d).

yes, definitely another possible example.

I think it's cool that you've created a formula for travel-sized summary of the different types. This is a prettily packaged idea, but I wonder if they could be expanded very slightly for clarity. Maybe I'm just slow, but I wasn't entirely sure what "realize harmony through analysis at the expense of ideal" meant on the first go-around. It took a few reads for everything you wrote to sink in.

think of a bargaining process. it's a compromise - ideal is given up so that a specific deal can be made. the method is analysis - division into smaller and smaller parts until the critical spectrum is found.

compare with ENFJ. "harmonize reality..." these wordings may seem interchangeable, but the focus shifts. to realize harmony is to bring about a mutually accepted, tangible harmony. to harmonize reality is to preach conformity, and remove the need for explicit agreements between differing interests altogether.

 

[OmoInisa]

This is beautiful. Very Ti
I wonder whether you had thoughts on its extension to form a relationship combatibility system. It seems to me it would be a small step.