BTW guys, i asked in PeC about the cognitive functions displayed in this video and one guy replied Si and Fi, would you agree?
I read Ne dom and aux are not likely to give explanations about their art for they think everyone has to make their own interpretations but i do think that then if this is what it means to me why should i hide it?
Si is highly present in art for when you see something it always makes a subjective impact on you, i mean not always, monalisa didn't make me feel anything at all but a lot of things do specially in certain moments, where you link every experience with a momentary feeling like in this case.. Every element in this video is connected to the main idea. Even ballons are because a experience i had about this story in real life and i turned it into this kind of wanna be nightmare, freak show. It was like a teather representation of all this coincidences that happen to me in this almost magical realism trip / relationship.
Original ballons pic i took on the streets:
Stop sign, stop heart, ballons, hopeful side, light in top goes darker, in the middle this painting with the maks representing different emotions. I thought it was quite meaningful composition. I was lucky of having the ballons passing by in that moment. They were gone in like 2 minutes.
Wouldn't it be then more of a Ni thing? Like, i saw this sunset and i thought of the eye of this girl i liked so much and she was like looking at me, like in the lord of the rings, this hallucinative trigger, and i saw it purple, i can kind of understand how this is a subjective impression of a percieved object but then i also remind of the explanation that gives Michael Pierce about Ni using the example of red ballons and how he associates it and make his perception fit for other idea and i think it's more or less the same thing.
Everything leads to the same point, there's nothing spreading or expanding about this video, there can be many different interpretations but they are wrong, cuz they are not the creator's one.
Everything just adds to the core of the idea which is the world of madness and pain caused by a failed relationship.
I obviously agree about Fi.
But if this is Si, how would be a Ni video?
And i'm not saying i'm a Ni user but it seems i will never be able to understand cf for everyone sees shit different.