No, I just find it amusing in a funny sort of way. I think life is largely pointless and so there is really no reason to make posts analyzing necessarily what is directly from the OP. Why not make things as pointless and absurd as possible [to reflect life] all the while having a bit of fun?
That may be true in the grand scheme of things...
Though a public setting (like this forum) is a different story. Moderation still exists because communities have subjective biases. People don't want trash in their parks. So a collective will is called for.
A community is injured by members who are only here to have one-directional dialogues, or who don't really care how their posts affect the overall landscape, but just want to spew out whatever comes out.
Posters who are non-contributive, but not necessarily bannable, have always presented a difficult situation. Borderline cases like DaBlob and BAP were eventually banned because ultimately, they were posting for nobody else - or were just unreceptive to any pleas for modification.
I will ask that if you wish to post, you do so with a consideration for the OP's wishes and the attention/time of those around you. Given what you just mentioned, I may be inclined to cut the story short rather than have it drag on for many years to come, as happened with the others.
I suppose this counts as a warning! So be warned.