• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Recent content by Oblivious

  1. Oblivious

    Hey there fukyo :)

    Hey there fukyo :)
  2. Oblivious


    I personally would attribute this behaviour not as a different flavour of Ti, but an interaction with the secondary function of Se in the ISTP and Ne in the INTP. The differences you mention seem to line up quite well with the differences in the sensing and intuition functions in any case...
  3. Oblivious

    What do think is your greatest flaw?

    I can code but I suck at documenting.
  4. Oblivious

    INTP's suck at typing others

    Strictly speaking, your mbti type is a classification of your preferences, and not a measure of intelligence or skill, which is what your ability to type someone would be.
  5. Oblivious

    This is the Happiness and Peace of Mind Committee

    Are you Happy? It's YOUR DUTY. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWIjvPuY2jo
  6. Oblivious

    America's Shadow (en masse: ESTJ)

    To add onto what Sir Duxwing said about programmers: http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/greatworks/mythical.pdf
  7. Oblivious

    Let's have an intelligent discussion

    That would be too obvious. You know, with all these intelligent people flouncing aorund here.
  8. Oblivious

    Let's have an intelligent discussion

    This is my idea of intelligent discussion.
  9. Oblivious

    Let's have an intelligent discussion

    None of you are aloud to touch my pee pee.
  10. Oblivious

    Oh yeah, forgot about this

    Wizard prinnies represent.
  11. Oblivious

    "When it comes to leadership and influence iNtuitive people have an edge over Sensing people."

    Watch this video, then read through this thread. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeK759FF84s
  12. Oblivious

    The philosophy of the weak

    It doesn't matter if it's a fallacy; I thought we cleared that up. The issue here is that your policies just seem self serving. Like a pedophile who argues that the age of consent should be lowered to five. Would you honestly take any arguments made by the pedophile seriously? Yes, an extreme...
  13. Oblivious

    The philosophy of the weak

    Walfin. It would be much better if you simply started a thread on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare_state Rather then this philosophy you got here. This is exactly what you want, but then you unintentionally make all these inflammatory statements that will send even peace loving...
  14. Oblivious

    The philosophy of the weak

    This is a contradiction. You have to clarify. You indirectly mention meritocracy because your philosophy is the polar opposite of meritocracy, so my usage of meritocracy is simply syntactic sugar. I am just doing what you wanted. I cannot speak for others, so I simply use my own...
  15. Oblivious

    The philosophy of the weak

    If you are willing to doom a successful person to failure, dooming a successful argument to failure is simply a matter of consistency. Then you are being inconsistent. Arguments cannot be viewed in a vacuum, because they cannot exist independent of persons. Argumentation is also a...
Top Bottom