Re: Why am I bannned?
Perhaps we are actually agreeing here. I have thought through morality to a fundamental level as well--weighing outcomes, intentions, practicality, survivability, and a utilitarian view of enjoyment. Now that is all intuitively known--allowing me to diverge from thinking about it all the time and going on to more creative endeavors. I suppose I've made my way across the bridge of blasphemy and heresy (in the context of both religion and societal norms), yet somehow have a personality that is accepted. I've gotten through the anxieties of not showing my true colors one act at a time until I came out of my shell completely--allowing my base survival instincts to be the purpose that my intellect serves. I found out that my true self is indeed not a danger to society, but it is the rebirth of my passion for life. The conqueror of my cynicism. The fuel to my fire.
But, what I am describing is not a thing where I just wait for bodily urges to happen. I have a lust that causes me to want to do things at all times.
I think life itself knows these things instinctually. It is the humans who have been alienated by thinking they have to commit to the style of life they were raised into that bring frustrations and confusion to the rest of the world--the madness always spreads, and it is people like us who are meant to stop it by clearing the air with an easily understandable explanation to help the frustrated and the damned--people suffering from the human condition.
For the most part I agree. Limiting oneself unnecessarily is truly a tragedy. Perhaps I used the wrong word and instead of saying "not acceptable" I should have said distorted. Here is where I disagree. Certain limits should be applied to what the social norms are in comparison to the rest of the community. This has always been the case for civilizations. Take murder and rape for example. Obviously it is under a subjective basis on whether or not these values can and do work for every civilization, but to bring order to a standard of what is acceptable is what the ultimately goal is by enforcing rules that the majority finds of value. Surely if tomorrow the US past a law that stated that murder and rape are no longer against the law things would change. Maybe not immediately, it may take time. But the point is that certain limits work for the benefit for both the individual and the group.
Perhaps we are actually agreeing here. I have thought through morality to a fundamental level as well--weighing outcomes, intentions, practicality, survivability, and a utilitarian view of enjoyment. Now that is all intuitively known--allowing me to diverge from thinking about it all the time and going on to more creative endeavors. I suppose I've made my way across the bridge of blasphemy and heresy (in the context of both religion and societal norms), yet somehow have a personality that is accepted. I've gotten through the anxieties of not showing my true colors one act at a time until I came out of my shell completely--allowing my base survival instincts to be the purpose that my intellect serves. I found out that my true self is indeed not a danger to society, but it is the rebirth of my passion for life. The conqueror of my cynicism. The fuel to my fire.
But, what I am describing is not a thing where I just wait for bodily urges to happen. I have a lust that causes me to want to do things at all times.
This seems to resonate so deeply with me that I can hardly believe that this is what you believe!
I think life itself knows these things instinctually. It is the humans who have been alienated by thinking they have to commit to the style of life they were raised into that bring frustrations and confusion to the rest of the world--the madness always spreads, and it is people like us who are meant to stop it by clearing the air with an easily understandable explanation to help the frustrated and the damned--people suffering from the human condition.