I deplore the MBTI and all advocates of it.

[CortLeaf]

It's the motivation for me reducing MBTI forums to litter trays. :D

[ProxyAmenRa]

It's the motivation for me reducing MBTI forums to litter trays. :D

It does make it easy for finding a niche forum to inhabit.

[CortLeaf]

Oh please, the MBTI merely categorizes characteristics, and the successful classification is vague itself. You could also discover the INFP's in high numbers on a poetry forum and the INTP's as such on a mathematics one. We could discover similar people through the interests which captivate people of comparable characteristics.

[Wish]

So my hypothesis WAS correct!

[CortLeaf]

You are adhering to rigid thinking through compliance to a flawed framework. How could the supposedly brilliant INTP's of this forum be passively advocating an obscure framework with no definite accuracies? There is minimal original thinking or contending behaviour in opposition of the MBTI, which is completely shameful when people claim to be fond of Jung.

Honor Jung and refine his framework, please. No longer abide to his archaic framework which is soon to become obsolete due to new models.

[Reverse Transcriptase]

We <3 you too :)

[Reverse Transcriptase]

We love you too :)

[Kuu]

redshirt (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RedShirt), how lovely

[CortLeaf]

We love you too :)

Love became cliche in the 60's and we progressed to mass murder. Oh, the love of killing, true intimacy with a body below me.

[RubberDucky451]

redshirt (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RedShirt), how lovely

That site just decimated 2 hours of my day :confused:

[Adymus]

Honor Jung and refine his framework, please.
Way ahead of ya.

[CortLeaf]

Way ahead of ya.

All of the extensions and modifications I viewed were inadequate. :rolleyes:

[Adymus]

All of the extensions and modifications I viewed were inadequate. :rolleyes:
You haven't viewed mine, that would be impossible unless I illustrated it for you.

[CortLeaf]

You haven't viewed mine, that would be impossible unless I illustrated it for you.
Do you want to share them with me? Have a contact e-mail?

[Adymus]

Do you want to share them with me? Have a contact e-mail?
I'd rather not, at least not until the book is published.

[walfin]

Oh please, the MBTI merely categorizes characteristics, and the successful classification is vague itself. You could also discover the INFP's in high numbers on a poetry forum and the INTP's as such on a mathematics one. We could discover similar people through the interests which captivate people of comparable characteristics.

You are adhering to rigid thinking through compliance to a flawed framework. How could the supposedly brilliant INTP's of this forum be passively advocating an obscure framework with no definite accuracies? There is minimal original thinking or contending behaviour in opposition of the MBTI, which is completely shameful when people claim to be fond of Jung.

Honor Jung and refine his framework, please. No longer abide to his archaic framework which is soon to become obsolete due to new models.

So the MBTI is invalid but stereotypes based on MBTI type are not?
:confused:

You are welcome to talk about the things on this forum that have nothing whatsoever to do with the MBTI, or to promulgate your own views of psychology, which may be sui generis or based on the Enneagram, Socionics, Kingdomality et al.

Way ahead of ya.

You haven't viewed mine, that would be impossible unless I illustrated it for you.

I'd rather not, at least not until the book is published.
Why do you always seem so ___J-like?

[Adymus]

Why do you always seem so ___J-like?
1. Because I am very confident that what I am saying is right, for good reasons of course.
2. I kind of like the idea of fucking with people who only have a basic knowledge of MBTI and wouldn't know the difference between a directive personality and an adaptive personality projecting directive behavior, or an Extrovert and an Introvert who can be outgoing.

and I don't always seem J like, just when talking about typology.

[ProxyAmenRa]

Oh please, the MBTI merely categorizes characteristics, and the successful classification is vague itself. You could also discover the INFP's in high numbers on a poetry forum and the INTP's as such on a mathematics one. We could discover similar people through the interests which captivate people of comparable characteristics.

I think you have misunderstood me. If you look at the content that this forum provides, regardless of the theme, it is a niche.